this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
41 points (97.7% liked)

Green Energy

2206 readers
178 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17201348

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fusion is a field where you can't have the "statup mindset": investments are in hundreds of millions and take at best a decade (and most likely two) to pay off. That's one field where it can't go anywhere without public funding.

It is very possible that China gets there first, considering how ridiculous western fusion efforts have been.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We've proved we can do fusion, but we're still at the stage of just having singular reactions. None of these are power stations with a continuous flow of output, and they're not even close to being so.

[–] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 months ago

I know. But we know it is "just" an engineering problem which can be solved at a high cost.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Currently, the highest Q value obtained from a tokamak is 1.53

I'm pretty sure this is the value of Q achieved by the National Ignition Facility, which uses inertial confinement, not a tokamak. As far as I know, the record Q for a tokamak is still only 0.67, set by the Joint European Torus back in 1997.