Incorrect. He totally understands the sign. The sign may have encouraged him more.
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
325 points (97.9% liked)
Funny
6625 readers
793 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Its a picture of a cat with a line though, which on its own means "no cat". But then they wrote NO at the top, it's a double negative and the cat is smart enough and pedantic enough to point that out.
Ah....
Ackshually, it looks like he's just now entering the room. Prior to this photograph, he was violating the room's strict "no no cat" policy with his absence.
And even if he could read it, he wouldn't give a fuck. He's a cat.
The sign clearly states black cats with white faces. So no rules were broken.
But even if the sign was correct AFAIK cats, they would not give a shit and do what they want anyway 🤣