this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
1328 points (97.5% liked)

Memes

45725 readers
1219 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buttons@programming.dev 2 points 5 months ago

That kid is superior

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

One thing I've been annoyed with after switching to Firefox is the iffy password manager performance. It's so common for it not to remember a password that it should, or, weirdly, for it to only remember the password once I've typed the whole username in and hit tab.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Functionality wise, chrome is better than Firefox but it's bad when it comes to privacy and ads

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (6 children)

What is literally one thing Chrome can do that Firefox cannot? Cause I can tell you right now, after tomorrow, only one can block ads.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Always gonna note too that Google Chrome (and chromium + derivatives to a lesser extent) kneecaps adblock plugins so that up to 50% fewer ad domains are blocked, blocklists are out of date, many in-page ads can't be caught, it's slower, and invisible trackers can bypass it.

[–] snownyte@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

People ignore how Firefox can take upwards of 8GB of memory because it wants to.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I haven't experienced that. What is the use-case that makes this happen? I have one machine with only 8 gig and firefox is fine, and a 16 and 32 gig machine, firefox has never eaten 8 gigs

[–] joe_cool@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

I have a VPS with 1 GB of RAM and Firefox with up to 3 tabs is fine. OK, it's running Linux maybe FF on Windows is worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›