this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
2 points (100.0% liked)

Damn, that's interesting!

4688 readers
1 users here now

  1. No clickbait
  2. No Racism and Hate speech
  3. No Imgur Gallery Links
  4. No Infographics
  5. Moderator Discretion
  6. Repost Guidelines
  7. No videos over 15 minutes long
  8. No "Photoshopped" posts
  9. Image w/ text posts must be sourced in comments

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Here's the thing. We could have that right now, today, we're there, they're right. Computers and just useful software (fuck AI) alone have increased productivity so much that one guy with fancy Excel can do the work of what used to take 98 people (7 banks x 14 person abacus teams). And that's just one regional bank. Before email, corporations had internal mailing departments, now there's dirt cheap and super convenient email. There are untold numbers of shell scripts out there quietly replacing whole ass departments of people. Soft automation alone, no robots needed, has increased human productivity to an absolutely bonkers degree since these statements were written. Thanks to the Friedman doctrine and Reagan and Thatcher and their ilk, all the benefits of that productivity got turned into a benefits for the asset holding class, while the middle and lower classes got lectures on the morality of hard work.

As a kid, my dad used to tell me stuff like that. He believed it too. He worked 2 jobs 6 days a week all his life to die in relative poverty.

People make wealth issues generational. It's not. It's a narrative to divide and conquer.

It's the rich vs the poor. It's always been.

[–] ironhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But instead, we decided to make a very small number of people extremely rich.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Bernie is pushing for 32/week.

If he was president we might have gotten it, but Biden sure as shit isn't even going to mention it.

American workers are more productive than at any point in history, it's just all the wealth goes into a very small number of pockets, and instead of having to pay taxes, they pay a small percent to politicians in both parties to ensure workers don't get any

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say we'd have gotten it. Being president doesn't mean you control Congress.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well he probably wouldnt have broken the railroad strike at least

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They got everything they wanted from the strike without having to fuck up the US economy. Stop thinking you’re dunking on Biden with this one, it’s stupid.

[–] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They structured a deal with the unions instead of striking. They got a 24% raise (biggest in 4 decades), platinum healthcare, and the things that were on the strike demands for each involved union.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/national-international/these-are-the-key-concessions-rail-workers-won-in-deal-to-prevent-strike/3158251/

No i meant huh? why would you start a conversation so rudely?