this post was submitted on 13 May 2024
0 points (50.0% liked)

Technology

34906 readers
1267 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh really? Let's calculate the power usage or billions of devices downloading and serving ads.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

How much would we save if we'd somehow be able to debloat and deshittify the Internet and all devices? Climate impact, overconsumption of unnecessary crap, mental health care...

[–] KarnaSubarna@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Well, since when Silicon Valley cared about environment or Global warming? It's all about $ always.

[–] gomp@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

How does it compare to crypto?

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter if its geothermal or some renewable

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

It does because that energy could've been used for other purposes. This is the Jevons paradox https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't really care about other commenters saying that the article doesn't have a reliable enough source. I know that commercial LLMs are terrible resource consumers and since I don't support their development I think they should be legally banned for this very reason.

[–] refalo@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

Worst take in the entire community right now.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 6 months ago

You can't ban LLMs at this point, they're too useful, it's impossible to track their use, they could be run anywhere on the globe, and even open source models that you can run locally exist.

The cat is out of the bag as they say.