this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
7 points (88.9% liked)

Games

16728 readers
596 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
7
Bethesda, too, is confused about Microsoft keeping COD on PlayStation when it made Starfield exclusive | VG247 (www.vg247.com)
submitted 1 year ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thepineapplejumped@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

COD is an already established franchise on both eco systems that always sells like candy. Starfield is a new IP not a fair comparison.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's really not confusing at all. Making COD an exclusive, especially during a console generation, would be a much larger controversy.

[–] Kaizar@tezzo.f0rk.pl 2 points 1 year ago

The console market as a whole is diseased, and as far as any self respecting gamer is concerned, ended with the ps360 era.