this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024

139 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16728 readers

800 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
No humor/memes etc..
No affiliate links
No advertising.
No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
No self promotion.
No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
No politics.

Comments.

No personal attacks.
Obey instance rules.
No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works

139

Manor Lords is off to a flying start on Steam, just hours after its early access release (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 6 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

5h in to the game, and just scratched the surface. Feels very good.

[–] benignintervention@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The mechanics that are in it now are incredibly well polished. I look forward to future updates. Props to the dev

[–] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 31 points 6 months ago

incredibly well polished

Because the dev is Polish.

[–] Seraph@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

Really looking forward to the hours I'll sink into this game!

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Can't wait for this to be fully released

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com -5 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Switch port?

[–] Summzashi@lemmy.one 8 points 6 months ago

Can't tell if this is a joke.

[–] teletext@reddthat.com 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

TI-30XIIS™ port?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

Come on now, that's just unreasonable, there screen isn't nearly big enough. I'd really like something for my old Ti-84 though, it has a much bigger display.

[+] callouscomic@lemm.ee -10 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Unfinished game already has art book and soundtrack DLC? Lol okay.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

You...do realize art and music are created as part of the process of creating a video game, right? So they spent a few hours taking that work, slapping it together, and adding it as absolutely unneeded dlc. Big deal.

The things people complain about, I swear.

[–] Shadowedcross@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

It's pretty common for EA games to have non-content DLC for people to buy if they wanna support the devs more. I don't have any issues with it, personally.

[–] theareciboincident@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

My brother in Christ, those are literally not game DLCs. You can just not buy it and still get the exact same game.

[–] HackerJoe@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

I'd sure hope they did those before release. Don't give them ideas selling in-game music as DLC later.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mind taking a moment to explain exactly why you believe this is a problem?

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Unfinished game has DLC. Ridiculous people don't see how stupid that is. Finish the fucking game. The art might change, there might be new art made, they might choose to make a new song.

It's like paying for a movie trailer before the movie is even finished.

People rail against DLC culture and then are defending this? Okay.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It's more like paying for a movie soundtrack or art book before the movie is released.

IMO it's not abusive, just offering people options that they can completely ignore without affecting gameplay at all.

If they were working on selling an expansion when the base game isn't done, that's different. Though even there, I'd say it's more an issue of priorities and ultimately would come down to how much do you have to pay for each piece of content and are they worth that price. And if the developer follow through on delivering everything promised (or if they do a good job of tempering expectations before the sale).

And personally, I have more of an issue with MTX than DLC (and am not one of the ones who rail against DLC culture). DLC is offering more content for a price, MTX is using money to unlock content that's already there. Sometimes one can be more like the other (like DLC to unlock a costume is pretty much MTX that you purchase outside of the game and MTX that enables new levels are pretty much DLC you purchase from within the game), but it becomes really problematic when the game is designed to just incentivise you to spend more money.