this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2024
139 points (98.6% liked)

Games

16728 readers
800 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mind taking a moment to explain exactly why you believe this is a problem?

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Unfinished game has DLC. Ridiculous people don't see how stupid that is. Finish the fucking game. The art might change, there might be new art made, they might choose to make a new song.

It's like paying for a movie trailer before the movie is even finished.

People rail against DLC culture and then are defending this? Okay.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

It's more like paying for a movie soundtrack or art book before the movie is released.

IMO it's not abusive, just offering people options that they can completely ignore without affecting gameplay at all.

If they were working on selling an expansion when the base game isn't done, that's different. Though even there, I'd say it's more an issue of priorities and ultimately would come down to how much do you have to pay for each piece of content and are they worth that price. And if the developer follow through on delivering everything promised (or if they do a good job of tempering expectations before the sale).

And personally, I have more of an issue with MTX than DLC (and am not one of the ones who rail against DLC culture). DLC is offering more content for a price, MTX is using money to unlock content that's already there. Sometimes one can be more like the other (like DLC to unlock a costume is pretty much MTX that you purchase outside of the game and MTX that enables new levels are pretty much DLC you purchase from within the game), but it becomes really problematic when the game is designed to just incentivise you to spend more money.