this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
140 points (95.5% liked)

Games

16378 readers
1308 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Toribor@corndog.social 47 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"We're making something new but it's boring and will suck." said no one ever.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

"We're making something new and don't have high hopes for it. Just don't even bother"

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 4 points 4 months ago

Anyway, here’s our new game Wonderwall.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

We’re going for a cross between spore and star field.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A quote from Vincke at the end of the post only stokes the excitement further. "I don't know if we’re going to pull it off," he wrote

This is so refreshing. A studio with big Ws that still goes balls out and takes risks. You love to see it. Take notes, gaming studios. This is how you make fun games.

[–] Pra@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

People didn't really like it when CD Projekt Red did that with Cyberpunk, and this is a pretty close mirror image of that..

[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 10 points 4 months ago

Because they failed, but then still delivered an unfinished game. If CD PR was as well managed as Larian rather than being shareholders' bitch, they'de be releasing Cyberpunk right about now, properly finished.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

The main problem with that one was a hypetrain without brakes that crashed into a solid wall of broken promises

[–] WolfLink@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago

People don’t like that cyberpunk was/is graphically unoptimized. If your computer can run it the game’s fine.

[–] Gamoc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You're saying this like the reason everyone was pissed off about cyberpunk was because of anything other than it not being finished. STILL.

I am not one for company loyalty but larian,hasn't dissapoşnted me yet, let's see where this leads to

[–] Rampsquatch@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is me being pedantic, but here goes: best work ever meaning this is as good as it gets, it's all down hill from here?

I know they mean best work yet but c'mon man, say what you mean.

[–] Bunnylux@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The studio would like to remind everyone that a group of Pedants is called a "Phlegm".

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 4 months ago

A group of redundants is called a redundants.