this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
33 points (97.1% liked)

PC Gaming

8568 readers
1148 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] VaultBoyNewVegas@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[–] ISOmorph@feddit.de 6 points 7 months ago

Should've worked on DS4 instead of churning out a remake that nobody asked for. EA being a bunch of jabronis again.

[–] Angry_Zombie@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Imo the graphics of ds2 still hold up. So aside from bugs caused by new hardware it doesn't need a remake.

[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I said the same thing about the original. The remake definitely wasn't needed to improve the game because it's still good looking and plays just like a modern game. But I did enjoy the remake regardless, moreso as an excuse to replay the original than as a new or improved experience.

Also gotta remember there is a whole generation of teenagers and adults now that were too young to play or appreciate these games when they first came out and most people aren't interested in retro games. A remake may be the only way they'd ever experience it.