They claim faster than an M3 Air, which is Apple’s lowest performing offering with no active cooling.
Who wants to bet these faster machines will be thicker, heavier and have active cooling?
this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
15 points (89.5% liked)
Windows
419 readers
11 users here now
For all things Windows.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
And use much more power
Spoilers: It won't
why are they always trying to compete with apple in the worst ways possible?
If people want to use apple devices, they'll just use apple devices.
Seriously if anyone from microsoft is reading this, ask yourself, why did so many people LOVE windows 7 and hate windows 8, 8.1, 10 and 11? Windows 8 is where it started going off the deep end and now we're at windows 11, where literally every change you're making is causing more and more people to teach themselves how to use linux.
And now to salt the wound, you fuckers are blocking people from using third party apps to make their systems work the way they want them to.
That's how you're choosing to compete with apple? to make your OS as shitty as possible? To take as much control away from the customer as possible? Are you sure that's the hill you want to die on? ...Okay. Your funeral.
To take as much control away from the customer as possible?
This is directly copying Apple's approach to software, though. Exclude any user-driven UX decisions, and force them to use The Apple Way. And it's worked for them; it's not an unreasonable conclusion to draw if you're trying to compete with Apple: Apple users hate configuration. Or, as my brother-in-law often says when he's frustrated with technology: "I don't want to know how it works, I just want it to fucking work." Lots of people consider computers to be just tools, like a hammer.
Those of us who hate this approach turn to other OSes, like Linux. It's obvious the Apple software architecture is not just to avoid any work to provide configurability, but to actually put effort into making configurability hard. This is what makes Macs maddening for many of us. It's the deep irony behind the 1984 Apple "Big Brother" ad campaign: Apple's objective is to make all its computers look and behave the same. If you redid the ad, but put all the audience in colorful clothes, it'd be appropriate.
You bring up a very valid point: MS seems to be picking this one attribute of Apple interfaces and concluding that it's what's going to let them steal Apple customers. Maybe it will, a few, but I agree with you that it's more likely going to drive even more MS users into the arms of Linux. Or, maybe Apple; I mean, if you have to be an ultra-conformist, why not pick Apple? At least the design aesthetic you're forced to adopt is attractive and easy-to-use.
Or, as my brother-in-law often says when he’s frustrated with technology: “I don’t want to know how it works, I just want it to fucking work.” Lots of people consider computers to be just tools, like a hammer.
That kind of mindset needs to be a thing of the past. Not having the patience to figure out how things work is how every war in my lifetime got started.
RT again
ive heard that one before. multiple times actually.
There’s nothing that an Arm processor can add to Windows that will make me choose it over a Mac. I just like the user experience of Mac a lot more than Windows.
As a Mac user, I’m excited for competition in this space.
I'm interested to see these chips with Linux.
You can (somehow) already use ARM with Linux, eg Armbian.
Have ya heard of Android?
GNU Linux, or non-GNU-but-still-POSIX Linux, not the bastard son of the Linux Kernel under a Java VM masquerading as a userspace.
The only chance is if they bring back Clippy