this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
34 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4051 readers
260 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Channel 4 presenter Cathy Newman is among more than 250 British celebrities who have become victims of deepfake pornography.

It comes as part of an investigation from the channel which aired yesterday evening, following an analysis of the five most visited deepfake websites.

It found that 255 of the almost 4,000 famous individuals listed were British, with all but two being women.

Among them is the channel’s news presenter, Cathy Newman, who said she felt violated on watching digitally altered footage in which her face was superimposed onto pornography using artificial intelligence (AI).

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Obviously horrible, but is Cathy Newman a celebrity?

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 0 points 6 months ago
[–] Tweak@feddit.uk 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'm gonna go against the grain and no doubt be downvoted, but surely this is overblown compared to the level of actual harm it causes? They're not real images, almost everyone is aware they're not real images, they don't have a negative impact on the lives of the victim beyond them being creeped out that people are perving over them (but again, everyone knows it's not really them).

I can see it has the potential for leading to actual harm, eg a stalker developing worse behaviour, but I don't really see that it meets the threshold in and of itself. It's only slightly worse than doing something someone else doesn't like or saying something offensive.

[–] byroon@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Does everyone know they're not real? I'm not suggesting they are real, only that for all I know the quality of these fakes might be convincing.
Whether this story is "overblown" or not is subjective I guess but the victim's being "creeped out" does seem like actual harm to me

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 4 points 6 months ago

Thee woman interviewed for the piece reckons it caused her harm.

[–] BuryMyHorse@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 3 points 6 months ago

In case you didn't read the article, the presenter in question isn't John Snow. Sorry for the disappointment

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml -2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

That’s awful! Where can these be found so I can avoid them?

But on a serious note, it’s kind of cool and also weird to mass produce this stuff when before it was relegated to one’s imagination. I’m not talking just the non-consenting pornography aspect but just this technology in general. We have a lot of growing up to do as a society.

[–] JoBo@feddit.uk -5 points 6 months ago

Send me a picture of your face, your location, and your employer, and I'll see if I can help you find out exactly how 'cool' it is.