this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
169 points (93.8% liked)

Technology

59135 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So, good journalism is dead? This article is a perfect example for it.

[–] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

i don't think we should act like journalism was in a great place before.

FB capitalized on a weakened industry, but it was the industry itself that was responsible for that state.

they really fucked themselves by not transitioning to the new market, instead insisting that it was the customers that were wrong. all these years later, i've yet to see a news outlet that would be worth the subscription fee. they're mostly recycling content from other, free sites anyway.

once the older crowd passes, traditional news outlets are done for. the ones that remain will be the ones that were providing the content all along.

[–] magiccupcake@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

True journalism seems to be on its way out. Why pay journalists to research and investigate when you can pump out tons of ai generated garbage for nearly free.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Because democracy needs journalism.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This article was written by an Australian ABC journalist - they are primarily government funded and the News Media Bargaining Code doesn't apply to them.

(their non-government funding mostly comes from creating content which they sell, for example Bluey).

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 16 points 7 months ago

Whenever I read or see the media complaining about social media I think of this https://theoatmeal.com/comics/reaching_people

Community groups suffer for the same reasons.

[–] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

Friendlyjordies watchers knowing it would be abc that advocates for this...

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It was a hot-and-cold affair that defined over a decade of online publishing and the work experience of a generation of reporters, and has ultimately left the industry a shadow of its former self.

Although it may be tempting for lots of reasons, the Australian government should avoid putting the boot into Meta by enforcing the News Media Bargaining Code as it's threatened to do.

Digital-only media outfits such as BuzzFeed and Vice rode a wave of growth, generating huge numbers of clicks that translated into ad revenue.

"Facebook encouraged news providers onto the platform in the ways it promoted content," Dan Angus, a professor of digital communications at QUT, said.

Instead of breaking up that monopoly, or closing tax loopholes, the Code effectively takes money from a profitable industry (big tech) and distributes it to an unprofitable one (news).

The News Media Bargaining Code is trying to restore a model for financing journalism that has gone the way of the fax machine, the fountain pen, and the pocket address book.


The original article contains 1,402 words, the summary contains 171 words. Saved 88%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!