this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
409 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18998 readers
3533 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 164 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I mean let's be honest, you gotta be some special kind of stupid to give money to somebody who bankrups a casino, let me repeat a CASINO

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 106 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 40 points 6 months ago

And he doesn’t even drink. Which calls to mind Hunter S. Thompson:

“It was Bogart who said, ‘You can't trust a man who doesn't drink.’ And it was Raoul Duke who said, ‘I'd never buy a used car from Nixon unless he was drunk.’”

[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 55 points 6 months ago

It's literally a free money from dumb people machine that he bankrupted by using it as his personal piggy bank.

Now he's turned the RNC into a free money from dumb people machine and he's using it as his personal piggy bank.

[–] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

During the CASINO BOOM!!! Then as a little footnote, gets bailed out by Wilbur Ross, who becomes secretary of commerce. The coal baron Wilbur Ross.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

The slipper guy. Is he dead yet? He fell asleep at his own hearing.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 75 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Well Donald doesn't have half a billion dollars, but you know who does?

Taylor Swift

Maybe he could ask her....wait...,that won't work...nevermind

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago (3 children)

I would fucking love if she just came out and said 'I could afford that. Why can't you?'

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I would love for anyone to say that, especially someone who isn’t famous.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

"Yeah of course I have that much, I just asked my dad for a small loan of 500 million dollars" - some rando from Tennessee

[–] 7U5K3N@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 months ago

She can't.. the y'all-queda would attempt to murder her. :/

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago
[–] bostonbananarama@lemmy.world 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The real question is why does someone who claims to be worth around $6B need a loan at all? It just doesn't make sense. /s

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 33 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
  1. you don't get rich by throwing away money (they'll never be repaid on that "loan").

  2. They want a winning candidate to give them tax breaks. They don't care about the other stuff. (Hmmm I wonder what that will mean. Trump is setting it up so that political donations go to him personally. Rich donors will see through that.)

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Tax breaks are just one of many things they expect to get, but yeah.

[–] maryjayjay@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] pearable@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Massive deregulation and the elimination of the EPA and the NLRB is more what I was thinking

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Plus straight up payola in the forms of government contracts, favorable policies, etc etc

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m tired of living in 2016.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Jokes on you, I'm living in 2020

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Invest in Ivermectin. Trust me.

[–] Baggie@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why what's going to happen to the horses? Surely we wouldn't need this for some hypothetical epidemic if one were to occur.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The horses? Vaush! Tacoma wept. You didn’t hear that from me.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 29 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Because businessmen expect ROI. Regardless of how upstanding they may or most definitely not be.

[–] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Plus, why lend the money when you can circle back around and scoop up the assets for a bargain after he declares bankruptcy?

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 17 points 6 months ago

I already love the smartass title of the article. “Upstanding Businessman” lmao

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Didn't his son say they get all the money they need from Russia? His buddy just won re-election over there, maybe he can help him out.

[–] Treczoks@lemm.ee 14 points 6 months ago

If he actually was an "Upstanding Businessman", they actually might. Need more reasons why they don't?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

My theory is that Trump is, in fact, a crook.

well it looks like the last horse finally finished the race. congrats! not the sharpest knife in the drawer though.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I don't understand this comment, even if meant sarcastically.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're making light of the fact that only now has the author come to the conclusion that Trump is a crook, something known by most of the world years, if not decades, ago.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The author of the article was using sarcasm and pointing out the obvious. It was a clever rhetorical tool.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Oh! Early morning me misunderstood your comment. I thought you were referring to the author's comment, not the previous commenter. Now I see what you meant.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Asked, and answered.