this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16748 readers
1319 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
35
Alone in the Dark (2024) Reviews (62 Top Critic Average 38% Critics Recommend) (opencritic.com)
submitted 8 months ago by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Eurogamer 2 / 5

PC Gamer 76 / 100

IGN 6 / 10

Metro GameCentral 6 / 10

GamesRadar+ 1.5 / 5

GameSpot 4 / 10

Hobby Consolas 85 / 100

IGN Italy 6.5 / 10

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Yikes, in an industry where the journalism generally skews positive, this is pretty bad.

[–] Splatterphace@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

When are they gonna learn they can't reproduce the reception of the first game?

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

If it doesn't have a gangly, hard to control protagonist, then it's not going to be the same.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

And this review by Skill Up. And this review by RagnarRox.

I guess the moral of the story is don't listen to these shitty "games journalists" that have to crank out reviews on a daily basis. Listen to your favorite YouTube games reviewer, who actually fucking plays these games, and get their opinion.

[–] nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

steam user review score and youtuber reviewers seem like the best combo.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

this review by Skill Up

this review by RagnarRox

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Odd, GManLives gave it a good review. I feel like a lot of these reviewers are basing their opinion off of the bad sequels before it.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 0 points 8 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

GManLives gave it a good review

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Props to honest reviewers. Fuck off, PC Gamer. You used to be good… in the 90s.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why does a slightly more positive review make them dishonest?

[–] BirdObserver@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It’s really weird how with gaming reviews in particular, people seem to demand uniformity. You’re a shill if you positively review a game that’s mostly reviewing poorly, and a hack if you give a game that’s reviewing well a number that isn’t high enough.