What’s bad for MAGA is best for America.
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
75 points (97.5% liked)
politics
18870 readers
4887 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I mean, I want to believe. But these pop-up shops have always been disposable. Moms for Liberty. Project Veritas. Swift Boat Veterans for Truth. They aren't built to last. Their staff will be recycled into the next astroturfed group, be it "Concerned Uncles Noticing Terrorists", "Freedom Advocate Rights Technicians", or "Grandmothers Overseeing All Temporary State Enforced Xenophobia".
And they'll get a dozen Op-Eds in your national news org of note, because Harlan Crow knows which Ombudsman needs a new RV.
That last one lol, G.O.A.T.S.E.X. Your creativity is wonderful!
And the rest of the world, more likely than not.
It’s actually way more of a sure thing than that, Trump winning in November pretty much signs the death warrant for virtually any climate change mitigation initiative. And while nuclear war is a very real possibility either way it’s clearly lower under the least impulsive of the two options
I think the US breaking its own oil production record was the death warrant.
what is this? good news monday?
Or, as I like to refer to them: KarenPAC
Clanned Karenhood
Klanned Karenhood, but yeah.
Nice
What does the last K stand for?
Krusty's Komedy Klassics
Ku Klux Klanned Karenhood
There's an extra K in there because it's trendy. Ubisoft released the first AAAA game, so the white supremacists gotta one-up it.
Moms for Baby-rearing slavery? With the various Christian Evangelist Fundamentalist "wins" in the last few years, hopefully it gets clearer and clearer that these issues are increasingly difficult to de-couple from the current Republican Party.
the current republican party is full of christian nationalist money.
so, yeah, it may need to be destroyed and split into a "here's where you christians can spew out your domination propaganda" and "here's actual conservatism with room for compromise."
On my mobile device the headline in the list view was cut off like
Moms for Liberty Is Slowly Imploding, and That’s Bad
And I had a hard time understanding how that could be a bad thing.
Maybe it's happening quickly enough that they aren't suffering very much?
I'm sure they'll take it like a champ.
Cue tiny violins.
🎻
I'm really surprised this many republicunts we're able to work this closely together for so long without eating each other sooner.
Thoughts and prayers
Klan Karenhood in the mud. That is good news.
Moms for Thievery, more like.
There's a small part of me that hopes this election will actually be less close than the media are portraying it to be, because they have a motive to keep people watching and less people will watch if they think it isn't close, and because their coverage suggests it'll be close this will hopefully ensure high turnout among anti-Trump voters.
Although the polling doesn't look great. (And I say this as someone who knows about confidence intervals, margins of error, and weighting)
As if GOP voting relied on their existence.
Gosh I feel for them... if only they imploded quickly and dramatically... and maybe there could be a significant enough scandal that most of them could end up in prison.
That's the karma these fucks deserve.
still waiting for the sauce sadge
Moms with STD’s
I know a mom with an STD. She's a good person and good mother, moreover she opposes MfL entirely. Let's not shame people for things that don't reflect on their poor character.
Let’s?
Respectfully, I am an individual who is not seeking an editor.
The transference and personalization of my quip aimed at Mom’s for Liberty to your friend is a crazy stretch, like your friend probably.
With your use of apostrophes to pluralise you probably need one.
It's been two hours. Should we tell him?
Tell him what, that he's right...?
Tell me, please.
Not you. The troll.
let's:
contraction
let us.
"let's meet for a drink sometime"
(It’s a contraction — my grammar is correct)
"STD's". And "IPO's" in your other post.
And "Mom's"
No one cares what you're seeking
Ad hominem attacks are weak and lazy when there are such great things to legitimately criticize them about.
Then do it