this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2024
49 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

59389 readers
3039 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Seems like after his satellite shenanigans in Ukraine, the US would be more.. cautious.

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or there is more to that story than we know as the general public.

[–] danhab99@programming.dev 0 points 8 months ago

That this whole war is orchestrated by the deep state which has private corporations as a branch of government just like every other war waged since WWII (the last real war)?

Literally why is anybody shocked?

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

This. Musk disabled Starlink to fark over the Ukrainians. He should not be trusted with any military contracts. Ever.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

He's already selling to both sides with Starlink. Who is to say Musk won't be doing the same with this? He's really playing up the Bond Villain stereotype.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

root password: "putin6969"

[–] darkpanda@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

In the recent Musk biography it was said that at some point after a meeting with NASA he changed his laptop password to “ilovenasa” so you’re not far off in terms of terrible password security if the story is accurate.

[–] llamacoffee@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A lot wrong here, I'm sorry to say, and I'm really not a fan of Musk. He is absolutely not selling Starlink to be used by Russia. That would be shut down real quick. (They may be using black-market terminals, but that's a different question.) And this new constellation will, as I understand it, be owned and operated by the US govt. Think like every single spy satellite ever: govt finds a contractor and asks them to do a thing.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Oh, right. They couldnt possibly make another and sell that to someone else, oh wait...

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Making boatloads of money

or

Making far less money along with loss of freedom for decades, or fleeing and sanctions while having your every shart logged...

[–] benignintervention@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.de 1 points 8 months ago

I spill my drink!

[–] vvv@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

Would you rather he, as a non-government affiliated citizen, pick a side? War is stupid. Communication is great. Maybe this is naive of me, but I think the world would be better, and maybe require less war, if everyone had equal access to communication.

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The fuck are you talking about? These are surveillance satellites, not some unity communications empowering satellites or something.

[–] vvv@programming.dev -2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Surveillance is a usecase for communication. I can't think of a communications technology that hasn't been (ab)used for surveillance... Books even! Historically people have been prosecuted due to the books they possess! Should our target of ire be the entity building the network? Or the entity wanting to use it for surveillance? The vibe I'm getting from this thread is that folks would prefer the US government, via NASA or otherwise, have control of the whole thing instead.

[–] Zron@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

You have no idea how a spy satellite works, do you?

They take pictures.

With really, really fancy cameras.

Cameras that are very carefully, and secretly, designed to be very good at their jobs.

No, you can’t just let some third party decide to use your fancy spy satellite, that means they now know what your satellite can and can’t do, which means they can hide things from it, which means it’s now just a very expensive lump in orbit.

And need I remind you that SpaceX is not some magical self funded space ferry service. They’re a US Government contractor, that’s where most of their money comes from. The satellites are made by other contractors. There’s not a government satellite factory somewhere in the desert, they pay companies like Boeing and Honeywell to make them the parts for the satellite, and then SpaceX gets money to launch it.

When the government pays for something, the contractor is legally required to keep their mouth shut about it, hand over the keys, and be available if it breaks. The contractor cannot just decide to let someone else play with the government’s toys, that’s called espionage.

[–] Pat12@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Would you rather he, as a non-government affiliated citizen, pick a side? War is stupid. Communication is great. Maybe this is naive of me, but I think the world would be better, and maybe require less war, if everyone had equal access to communication.

I recently read about Ted Hall who shared nuclear secrets with the Soviet Union because he thought everyone should have equal access to nuclear weapons and this would prevent another world war.

Your logic is similar and it's not a good thing.

[–] vvv@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago

Putting aside the fact that this is a bit of a straw man, multiple countries having nuclear capability is the only thing preventing nuclear war. Russia does not nuke the US (or allies) because they know the US will respond with a nuclear launch of its own. same for the other way around. Awareness and access to similar capabilities makes everyone think twice about becoming the aggressor. if I had to pick, a cold war is preferable to a hot one.

[–] Savaran@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I would rather they fund NASA to the fullest, and nationalize SpaceX under them.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Maybe this is naive of me

It really is. We're not discussing the philosophy of free and open communication, we're talking about a single narcissist who has been given money and power and how that's a problem.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Musk is a massive POS that cannot be trusted to maintain equal access to that communication.

What don't you grasp about that?

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee -5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're (probably knowingly) spreading disinformation if you're implying SpaceX is selling Starlink terminals to Russia. You have no moral standing to criticize them if you yourself are spreading lies.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's not disinformation at all. Russians are using Starlink on the battlefield. SpaceX knew, and didn't report it. Russians continue to use it without any remediation from SpaceX yet. That sure as shit meets the bare minimum in my book as complicity.

Why are you on here being a fence or fact checker for Russia and SpaceX anyway? Fuck Russia, and Fuck Elon Musk.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

The accusation being made here is not about Russia using Starlink but about SpaceX selling them to both sides for which I haven't seen any evidence for. You can not like Musk all you want but making statements like that as if it's an established fact is dishonest. It implies malice when the most likely explanation is that these terminals simply just were obtained via 3rd parties. Starlink doesn't work in Russia or in the occupied territories but it does work near the front lines because Ukraine is using them there so if Russians are able to obtain an active terminal somehow then there's a good chance it will work.

You also seem to be implying that SpaceX isn't doing anything about it. What are you basing this on? How could you know? They've said that they're going to disable all terminals found out to be used by sanctioned parties and I don't see any reason to assume they're not doing this. For all we know they could have disabled hundreds if not thousands terminals by now. Ofcourse if you have evidence to the contrary then I'm interested in seeing it.

Why are you on here being a fence or fact checker for Russia and SpaceX anyway?

Because I have no dog in the fight and I only care about the truth. I have zero interest in the anti-Elon circlejerk - I'm just trying to figure out what's actually going on.

[–] Syn_Attck@lemmy.today -1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

We will find out soon enough. https://www.businessinsider.com/spacex-starlink-russia-elon-musk-democrats-2024-3

why are you fact checking anyway?

Showing our true feelings now, are we?

And people laugh when I say both sides are idiots. bothsides lmao! yeah? but they do X while I sit here and do X! so you can see how dumb and stupid they are right guise!

That's enough Lemmy for me today.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

straight up supervillain shit, as always

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

" . . . for U.S. intelligence."

Yeah. Sure. Right. Musk will sell Intelligence to ANYONE who pays for it and US taxpayers will foot the entire bill for constructing the satellite network.

And then all the contractors and politicians will all pretend to be surprised by this and Musk will get the finger-wagging of a lifetime.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Seems problematic, considering what a fuckwad musk is.

[–] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Having mega corporations design space networks for you sounds like a great idea until they decide to lock you out and hold your government hostage. Or sell intel… Or sell access to other actors….

Just admit it—the corporations run the world at this point.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 8 months ago

Nah, part of this is specifically that the US government owns it. This isn't SpaceX just providing access. Think of the US government buying an F-35 or something.

I imagine that might be because they want to do things with it that'd be riskier than what SpaceX does with SpaceX's constellation -- i.e. adversaries might aim to dick it up.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Just spitballing here, but it will get hacked and cause a major problem, if not a crisis.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They'll probably all drop out of orbit before that happens though. I give it a week from launch.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The more ridiculous, the more plausible, because it has happened. 😂