this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
145 points (100.0% liked)

LGBTQ+

6192 readers
3 users here now

All forms of queer news and culture. Nonsectarian and non-exclusionary.

See also this community's sister subs Feminism, Neurodivergence, Disability, and POC


Beehaw currently maintains an LGBTQ+ resource wiki, which is up to date as of July 10, 2023.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bad news, folks. The Tories have proven yet again that they're complete and utter wankers.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 73 points 8 months ago

The government said it welcomed the "landmark decision", adding it would help ensure care is based on evidence and is in the "best interests of the child".

It's truly insulting that they even dare suggest that this is in the best interests of trans kids, or that it's based on any evidence. Puberty blockers save lives.

It follows a public consultation on the issue

Since when is public opinion relevant for the availability of healthcare? Can we have expert opinions, please?

The review followed a sharp rise in referrals to the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS)

"More people need this treatment than ever before! Better completely cut off access to it!" is such a malicious position to take. I actually don't understand how these transphobic fucks can be so callous and insensitive.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 59 points 8 months ago

TERF island still living up to its name.

[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 53 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The whole Anti-LGBT campaign blowing over from the US to Europe. In the Netherlands I see more and more of the same 😭

[–] keiko@fedia.io 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Why are people so quick to hate what they don't understand? It's infuriating and exhausting. I really hope they will move on from this after the US election, but I worry that it will only continue to get worse.

[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 38 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's because the extreme-right campaigns are fuelled by hate and discontent. And it helps them by chanelling it towards minority groups by blaming them for everything (obviously a majority won't work because they would alienate too much of their own userbase). So the narrative is 'the brown people' cause all the problems, the LGBT community etc etc. Hate unites people more easily than love 😢

What worries me the most is that formerly normal sane 'friends' actually buy into this BS and have become rabiate trans-haters practically overnight. 😢

[–] keiko@fedia.io 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

The trans minority specifically seems to be the ultimate scapegoat for them, since it's such a tiny minority. I'm really not liking the "First they came for..." vibes. Actually terrifying.

I'm sorry about your 'friends' and hope you're safe from them. Sending you love ❤️

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

It's happening in so many places, at the same time as actual fascism is on the rise globally. Those "first they came for..." vibes are not an exaggeration.

[–] Zworf@beehaw.org 5 points 8 months ago

Thank you ❤️ But I'm not trans myself (though I am kinda on the LGBT spectrum). I do have several trans friends and I don't stand for that kind of derisive talk. All this hate has prompted me to join campaigns at work and help organise events because I want to do something against it.

The trans minority specifically seems to be the ultimate scapegoat for them, since it’s such a tiny minority.

Yes exactly. The smaller the minority and the more they stand out the better. Because there is less likelyhood that they offend their own supporters, or that those actually are friends with someone from the minority and know things are not as presented.

I always ask why they are so hung up on trans people, after all they harm no one, and what they do is their business alone. It always results in some contrived reason. The point my "ex-friends" kept bringing up was their children, somehow they are harmed irreparably if they see someone who used to be a man in women's clothes. Or that it's not "natural" (so what, your tattoo isn't either, or many other lifesaving medical procedures). But anyway I got sick of this discussion.

But it's terrifying how much crap they are presented with on things like TikTok and Instagram, once they view one hate video it serves them more and more because they keep looking at them. Most of them are easily debunked but there are just so many.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, the UK has their own anti-trans movement independent of the US. Any official 'Harry Potter' products directly fund it (thanks, Rowling).

[–] frog@beehaw.org 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Rowling overplayed her hand recently, I think. There's a podcast I listen to every day, whose host I enjoy a lot, and most of his regular guests I like as well. One of them I'm not a fan of because she's pretty transphobic... until Rowling attacked India Willoughby. That, it seems, was a step too far, because this previously rather transphobic lady was like "hang on a second, India Willoughby is a woman though", and has settled into a new position of "there's conversations that need to be had about prisons and sports, but otherwise trans people are not a threat and we need to be more tolerant". This is someone who has, on occasions, induced such rage in me that I ended up yelling at the podcast, and her change of tack caught me completely by surprise. When Rowling has started frothing at the mouth so much that even other transphobes are rethinking their views, things feel a little less hopeless.

[–] supakaity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think it's because a lot of her fans were like "hang on, she's just misunderstood, she's not really transphobic, just doesn't want those fake transes going into women's spaces", and Rowling kept it pretty vague, open for misinterpretation, not really ever able to be pinned down as actually being provably transphobic in the minds of many.

But something happened recently and it tipped her over the edge, from keeping her donations low key and her transphobia aimed at the theoretical "not really a woman 'trans-identified-male' boogeyman-woman" (who doesn't really exist), to outright making open donations to anti-trans groups and attacking real trans women.

All the sudden her supporters are like... Wait, this is not who we thought you meant… Where are these scary men? The ones invading women's spaces that you were talking about?

[–] frog@beehaw.org 9 points 8 months ago

Yep. I do reckon there's a percentage of transphobes who are imagining hordes of men pretending to be women to get into women's spaces, but genuinely do have no problem with actual trans people (even in women's spaces. Even as a trans person, I think the belief that, for example, the small number of convicted rapists claiming a trans identity need to be far more closely scrutinised than someone with no history of acting in bad faith, is reasonable.) Now that Rowling is saying the quiet parts out loud, she becomes repulsive to that particular group.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 months ago

I truly hope that you're right, but many in the US had similar thoughts about Trump.

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 48 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's torture and irreparable harm.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Yeah. I heard about this on the radio, and my first thought was, "Oh shit, those suicide rates are going to skyrocket."

My second thought was "Should I throw a bucket of gravy over whoever's responsible, or should I come at them with a cricket bat?"

[–] FfaerieOxide@kbin.social 25 points 8 months ago

“Oh shit, those suicide rates are going to skyrocket.”

Oh nah, people are absolutely going to die as a direct result of this decision. More many will have scars.

It's still murder—still assault—if the weapon you form against a person is their own beleaguered hand.

I weep for needless death.

[–] Zoop@beehaw.org 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I vote cricket bat, then throw a bucket of gravy on them as they lay on the ground. Then spit on them. Then kick them... A lot!

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 8 points 8 months ago

Make sure the gravy is good and salty, too.

[–] RadioRat@beehaw.org 38 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Kids are going to die because of this.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Conservatives don't care. For everyone's sake they need to go. It's so saddening to see the UK government copying the ideas of right-wing extremists in the USA.

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 7 points 8 months ago

That's the point.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

thank god nhs scotland is separate from nhs england but the sad thing is the waitlist was already absurd long and the tory and labour's pursuit of pseudoscience will just harm trans people even more.

never mind the fact that something used for THREE DECADES for cis children is hardly experimental... and still used today for trans and cis children in other countries.

[–] FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The government said it welcomed the "landmark decision", adding it would help ensure care is based on evidence and is in the "best interests of the child".

Because nothing says evidence based care based on the best interests of the patient than blanket-banning treatment based on zero evidence whatsoever.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 8 months ago

especially treatments which work fine for years and many other countries

[–] Shhalahr@beehaw.org 6 points 8 months ago

They think that just because they never heard of puberty blockers before last year that they are some new and novel thing.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 24 points 8 months ago

Fuck this shitty terf island

[–] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Why not also forbid antibiotics and cough medicine /s

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Because that wouldn't hurt vulnerable minorities in particular. It's the old fascist technique of feeding people scapegoats on whom they can blame their troubles and take out their anger and frustration, so that they never ask whether the government might be responsible for their problems. It works best if you victimize a minority group that most people are unfamiliar with, and make it dangerous for people of that group to show their faces in public. Then the masses will never learn that they are not to be feared and hated.

Unfortunately the British people are staggeringly easy to convince that the government of the last 14 years has nothing to do with their declining quality of life over the last 14 years. It makes this scapegoating propaganda all too easy.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

fucked up

I believe this was deliberate and not just a fuck up.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 8 months ago

"The cruelty is the point".

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago

Fair point. I'll change it.

[–] NoOnesLazyInLazyTown@beehaw.org 11 points 8 months ago

This is going to fuck over kids that go through precocious puberty and cancer patients.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryIt follows a public consultation on the issue and an interim policy, and comes after NHS England commissioned an independent review of gender identity services for children under 18 in 2020.

Dr Hilary Cass, who led the review, published an interim report in February 2022 saying there was a need to move away from one unit and recommended regional options be available to better support children.

The NHS said children attending these clinics will be supported by experts in neurodiversity, paediatrics and mental health, "resulting in a holistic approach to care".

John Stewart, national director of specialised commissioning at NHS England, said the responses were "polarised" in line with the debate around puberty blockers.

Mr Stewart said: "Many people said the policy didn't go far enough in terms of still allowing potential access (to puberty blockers) through research, and others saying clearly they disagreed fundamentally and that these should be routinely available to everyone who believes they need it."

Former prime minister Liz Truss "welcomed" NHS England's decision ahead of her Health and Equality Acts (Amendment) Bill which is up for its second reading on Friday.


Saved 71% of original text.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago
[–] keiko@fedia.io 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Sorry for the off-topic comment, but what's the syntax for making a collapsible quote like that? Anyone know?

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Not sure if this is standard or GitHub-flavoured Markdown, or a special thing just for Lemmy, but you use ::: spoiler.

For example:

Click here to see the summaryThis is the summary

Becomes:

Click here to see the summaryThis is the summary

EDIT: This won't look right in Arctic

[–] keiko@fedia.io 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Let's see if it works on Mbin...Yay, it worked! Thank you! ❤️

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Also doesn't work in Boost.

I wish Lemmy would convert markdown to HTML on the server side so we can have an actual standard for formatted text.

[–] dontpanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago

Like this!

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

spoiler Click here to see the summary

It follows a public consultation on the issue and an interim policy, and comes after NHS England commissioned an independent review of gender identity services for children under 18 in 2020.

… more body text …

Former prime minister Liz Truss "welcomed" NHS England's decision ahead of her Health and Equality Acts (Amendment) Bill which is up for its second reading on Friday.


Saved 71% of original text. ::: :::

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We did it Patrick, we saved the city! 🙃