this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2024
18 points (95.0% liked)

worldnews

4815 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"The times of peace are over, the post-war era is over. We live in new times - in the pre-war era; for some of our brothers, this is no longer even the pre-war era, but the period of full-scale war in its most cruel version," Tusk said.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wonder what everyone's thoughts are on this. Personally I think Russia is spent and would need at least 5 years to train new troops, build new tanks, etc to the point of waging an effective war at any scale, let alone against NATO. Could easily be 10 with continued sanctions. By that time Putin could easily be dead and I see nothing structural that could lead to the next Russian President wanting to wage a war. Just have to wait out Putin with sanctions.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Putin’s waiting for the US Supreme Court to make good on what he paid for— finish reinstalling Trump so he can carry out his vision

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Exactly this. The 4 Biden years were an unforeseen fluke that threw a bit of a wrench in the gears. But make no mistake, the goals remain unaltered.

[–] damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Poland would know.

[–] omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think NATO members were ever at risk, especially now we know how ineffective the Russian military is in modern warfare

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 1 points 6 months ago

Doesn't matter when he threatens to nuke you if you fight back. He's banking on using nuclear deterrence offensively, hoping that neither the UK nor France would really risk mutual destruction over some eastern European states. And the US is probably gonna elect Trump again and solidify their downfall.