Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
So, being from America, my first thought after reading an article with a similar take to yours is that I wish this was the type of political problem that made headline news in my country.
Moving on, what do you think? Did the Irish people let the perfect be the enemy of the good, or was the language so fatally flawed that it could actually make things worse?
Oh it was awfully worded, for the Care Amendment they changed 'endeavour to ensure' to 'strive to support' when it came to the government offering child welfare and the disabled. Yeah, sexist language was removed but at what cost.
For the Family Amendment, families based on 'marriage' became '...marriage or durable relationships'. What the fuck is a durable relationship? Am I now in a relationship with my mate cause we rent an apartment together? If they leave, will there be a divorce? (Hyperbolic but you get the gist). Weirdly enough, we would've inadvertently became the first Western nation to legally recognise polyamory.
Both of the amendments set out to solve real issues: *Sexism (Care) and not recognising single parent households (Family).
*The Care one only used sexism as a trojan horse to gut welfare. You could have easily worded it to get rid of the sexist langauge without slyly trying to screw over disabled people (there's a case in SCOTI (Supreme Court of Ireland) that is deciding this soon). (However, weirdly this only protects women carers, read it yourself).
The amendments were shite and every party besides one small left-wing one rejected them before the vote shockingly.
Now, ultra-right wing nuts are trying to frame it as Ireland 'protecting traditional values' by saying women are in fact homemakers and all of that implied 'they belong in the kicthen' crap, and how 'marriage is sacred'. It's a real shame, cause the ideas were sound themself but written so badly we had to shoot them down and now the everyone in the government is playing the blame game.