-edited for results- NSFW Content is now fully permitted BUT it must be tagged. Any NSFW content that has not been tagged and blurred will be removed. Content warnings should also be added to the title in brackets. Example: [penis] or: [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged. Yes, even female breasts. IRL GORE IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER ANY CONDITION.

top 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As long as something that might get me in trouble if my boss saw it is marked as nsfw (and so blurred by default) i don't care. So i think any level is fine so long as it's tagged appropriately

Edit: I wasn't thinking about gore. Personally i'd prefer that not be allowed but if it is and blurred i can accept that

[–] pezmaker@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seconded. If it's marked nsfw and blurred, it's my choice to view at that point and I don't give a shit. My bad for playing roulette and losing if I clicked it and regret it.

[–] oshitwaddup@lemmy.antemeridiem.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly

[–] catsup@lemmy.one 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally, I'm fine with sexual content as long as it's marked properly. But gore (aka NSFL content) should not be allowed here

[–] YolkBrushWork402@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah i think Gore, any kind of gore should not be allowed here.

[–] CreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm cool with it as long as it's marked, I just think we need to establish a line on what counts as NSFW or not since some things toe the line. Like are we hardline marking anything even remotely sexual, or just things that are clearly NSFW. Obviously the former would be easier to moderate because of the subjective nature of things, so I wouldn't be opposed to that.

Also do mods not have the ability to edit a post so they are marked as NSFW if it's not already marked?

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And please for the love of fuck make a difference between NSFW sexual and NSFW gore

[–] CreamyWeenie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For the sake of putting in my opinion I agree gore shouldn't be allowed here. Although I'm pretty sure that's already the case considering the instance we're in and also this community's origin.

[–] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago

So who is going to take one for the team and start fucking cakes?

[–] abs_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure tagging nsfw imagery is standard. Stuff like cropped porn, horny art and the like. Horny text gets a pass I think. Not sure about NSFL

[–] PaigePalisade@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for not having different rules for men and women

[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

No problem! Feels pretty ass backwards that most places don't

[–] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If cannibalism is fine why not titties

[–] ch1cken@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If cannibalism is fine

??? wtf? sarcasm?

[–] moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Check my post history. We genuinely had to have a vote on wether to allow "cannibalposting"

[–] buckykat@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

six days ago, the previous poll

[–] Rekticulum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Yet another in a series of mod W after mod W

load more comments