Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
It's not an error. She is clearly biased, should be removed from the case, and barred from ever holding public office again.
It's an error but not a mistake. An error is simply when something has gone wrong. Intentional fuckery can cause errors.
That’s all well and good, but I feel like she’s done like 10x what it would take a judge to normally get pulled from the case and she’s still in it, so I’ll celebrate when she actually gets removed and censured
Okay, time to appeal and ask the 11th Circuit to remove her from the case. This is a glaring departure from responsible jurisprudence. She is now willfully putting witnesses and others at risk. Exposing those witnesses names and the essence of their testimony puts them at immediate risk of harassment from Trump's red-hat hordes at minimum, and likely even personal risk for them and their loved ones.
They'll probably wait until someone on their team is literally murdered by someone screaming, "Trump is king!" or something. People have proven time and time and time again to be underestimating of evil people, yet continue to underestimate. They think the mere existence of laws deters bad people like it does "good" people.
They think the mere existence of laws deters bad people like it does "good" people.
Why doesn't someone just make crime illegal? Problem solved!
They're probably hoping for just that. It would mean further delays.
WRIT OF MANDAMUS!!!!!!
Is the judicial branch allowed to order the release of classified materials?