this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
154 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19080 readers
3888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 42 points 8 months ago (3 children)

He would have to give local police the authority first, right now they literally CAN'T enforce federal law.

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/local-police-should-not-do-a-federal-job/

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/federal-judge-blocks-texas-law-that-gives-police-broad-powers-to-arrest-people-suspected-of-illegally-entering-u-s

The too long, didn't read... illegal immigrants aren't breaking state or local laws, they are breaking federal laws.

Local law enforcement does not have the authority to enforce federal laws, only federal officers can do that.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

He would absolutely do that if it suits his agenda. Branding it as "empowering the nation's police" or some bullshit like that will make the thin blue line crowd that constitutes a large chunk of his voters happy.

[–] MrNesser@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If a local law enforcement is required to uphold federal laws doesn't that make them federal employees?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

You would think, and subject to federal pay and benefits, but also subject to government shutdown. ;)

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

The fact he doesn't follow the Law is EXACTLY why the Law and Order crowd VOTES for him!

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Deport trump

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 10 points 8 months ago

"Papers please"

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

The question it's what America would do without that cheap labor force..

[–] joel1974@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Farms will stop functioning. Lemmys will go to the grocery store and say "where is the food?"

[–] shikitohno@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A good chunk of restaurants will also suddenly close or have massive price hikes when they can't count on taking advantage of undocumented people and paying them sub-minimum wage off the books.

[–] norbert@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A lot of people have absolutely no idea just how much of their food and housing is so cheap because of (often undocumented) immigrant laborers.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Food, yes. But housing? How do you figure?

Also, lol at calling housing "cheap".

[–] norbert@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Every contractor out there uses undocumented labor. Drywall, roofing, landscaping, all skyrocket in price without the labor of immigrants.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

The industry I work in "flooring " hope you don't want carpet or floors install in your homes. Because 99% of the labor done by illegal immigrants.

They are responsible for all the apartments in the Tulsa, Oklahoma area I know for a fact.

And the reason they only ones doing it because what I been told by few older contractors is pricing for carpet installers hasn't changed since the fucking 1990's.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's true. But you're wrong about calling housing "cheap", unless you're in "flyover country".

[–] norbert@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Cheap is subjective but if it makes you feel better to say "you're wrong" then OK, thanks for contributing.

It would be more expensive without undocumented labor.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone's touchy about being corrected.

Whatever.

[–] norbert@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Someone feels the need to jump into conversations to try to correct subjective statements while actually contributing nothing to the conversation. They should've began their statement with "well akshully!"

"Whatever."

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Rural America needs to decide what they want to have happen.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

They’re too warped by identity politics to focus in any resemblance of solving problems

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Had no idea police could be used that way. Yikes.