I have no love for religious fascism, but America had 42 state executions in a similar timeframe (2022-2023) also for crimes like murder, but I doubt the coverage was the same.
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2024
68 points (97.2% liked)
worldnews
4831 readers
2 users here now
Rules:
-
Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.
-
No racism or bigotry.
-
Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.
-
Post titles should be the same as the article title.
-
No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.
Instance-wide rules always apply.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Probably because the US didn't do them at a stadium...
That is a fine hair you are splitting there...
I feel like public executions are a whole lotta worse than regular executions
a whole lotta worse than regular executions
Only to the people justifying state murder. To the person involved, they are still dead either way,
To me the Saudi.Taliban methods are more honest, though just as mortally reprehensible as the USA's. The Saudi's are proud that they murder their citizens and are not afraid to show it.
This has the same energy as saying all forms of execution are just as bad because the person is dead in the end anyway. Lol
Yes. That was my point.
You find it funny.
I find it sad that a nation that claims life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as founding tenets defends the death penalty.
Lol right, the US does it more clinically with injections and gasses. Much better, historically speaking.
The suffering of an individual is not the same as a public execution in a stadium, nor is the message the same.
Proponents of the US death penalty claim it is for deterrence, so I'm not really seeing a difference. Pretty sure you can also go witness a US execution if you're so inclined.
Having a random civilian shoot a criminal with thousands of spectators in a sports stadium.
Executing a criminal with lethal injection to an audience of 12
Centrists: It’s the same thing!1!!
random civilian
Not exactly
Why is this comment upvoted so much?
Centrists: It’s the same thing!1!!
Response from a country that does not ahve the death penalty.
Well, they are...
It is not how the state does it that is the problem but that the state does it.
There is no way to humanely kill someone who does not want to die.
Yeah, what about the US and their stadium packed, public executions as a form of spectacle, it's just barbaric. The US is well on the way to also execute people as part of the Superbowl half time show. The sick bastards.
Paint the picture however you please, a state sanctioned murder is still a state sanctioned murder regardless of how many people witness it.
I'm against capital punishment. But the dirty 'what about', 'false equivalency' just takes attention awaily from the original article and subject. Maybe think about that.
The subject is that the taliban organized
- A public execution
- where the victim has/gets to shoot the purpetrators
- in a crowded stadium.
If you want to rail against US capital punishment go do that, start threads, but not everything needs to be about the US.
But while it is, since it’s already are — the Taliban offer direct participatory justice. The entire community sees the wrong being made right and the aggrieved party carries out the righting.
In the US, the justice is outsourced. The execution in some dingy cellar with ridiculous drugs.
This leads to a simple conclusion. The Americans are the soy boy and Taliban are Chad.
I bet if the victims had to pull the trigger, the US would get their number of state-sanctioned murders down to taliban levels.
And what channel were these broadcast on? How many sick fucks tuned in?