this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
28 points (88.9% liked)

politics

18986 readers
4274 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] robocall@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Lee should drop out for two reasons. She's splitting the progressive vote with Porter, which benefits Schiff. And she's 77 years old. California and the country were outraged that Feinstien didn't have the dignity or class to resign prior to her death. And for some reason Lee thinks now, at nearly 80, is the time to begin a new path of public service.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You know it’s bad when- thanks to the other party- you have to check if “brawl” is literal.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

wrestling announcer voice "Porter, with the whiteboard! ... Oh my god the humanity!"

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

quick, somebody get Bernie a chair.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

BAH GAWD THAT’S AOC’S MUSIC

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Katie Porter is the real deal. End of story

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 4 points 7 months ago

And my axe!

Also my vote.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

What a good time to donate to the Katie Porter campaign. Or even volunteer, if you live in Cali and have the time.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

March 5th is coming very soon.

[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So she'll want a strong home stretch blitz. Or were you just trying to shit on dems instead of actually support the best candidate? Sorry, if so.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

She's one of the best politicians we have.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

“The progressive movement has followed this race with growing unease,” said a prominent progressive operative who spoke candidly on condition of anonymity. “The polling suggests both Lee and Porter are splitting the same voting bloc and could allow Adam Schiff — a white straight man without much of a progressive record to run on — to avoid a one-on-one matchup with a formidable, tested progressive in deep blue California. National progressives need to coalesce behind the most viable progressive candidate ASAP and the candidate with the toughest path needs to step aside for the good of the movement.”

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is why first past the post sucks...

We need ranked choice voting and we need it yesterday.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Adam Schiffs and Nancy Pelosis of the world think it works just fine

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

Those in power would say that tho.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


So it’s no surprise that the contest to replace the late Sen. Dianne Feinstein has devolved into a pitched battle between prominent Democratic House members eyeing the coveted job.

The race has sparked fiery attacks between Democratic establishment favorite and frontrunner Rep. Adam Schiff of Burbank and economic-populist Rep. Katie Porter of Orange County fueled by some chicanery to try to exploit the state’s top-two system.

The shadow-boxing began nearly a month ago when Schiff rolled out a TV ad cheekily promoting Garvey, calling him “too conservative” for California and tying him to former President Donald Trump.

She recently debuted a digital ad drawing attention to the little-known GOP candidate Eric Early, calling him “way too MAGA for California” and more pro-Trump than Garvey.

Progressives are increasingly fearful that their two candidates — Porter and Lee — will split left-leaning voters and lock each other out, paving the way for a Schiff versus Garvey showdown.

Porter is best known as a Sen. Elizabeth Warren-style populist, pushing economic issues like childcare and taking on corporations with her characteristic whiteboard, while Lee has long advocated against wars like Afghanistan, for civil liberties and reining in the Pentagon.


The original article contains 1,158 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!