this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
40 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

34442 readers
356 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffers00n@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand why journalists continue to call users with the blue check-mark "verified". There's no verification of anything but a credit card. Verification is a relic of the past and they need to shift their language to match reality. Maybe call them "paid" users.

[–] KeefChief12@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah verified actually had some weight in the past.

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone should take screenshots and put them on the internet. It will scare Microsoft and others into not running ads on Twitter.

[–] Pechente@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly. I don’t get the mentality of not running ads in a YouTube video where someone said „fuck“ but being completely fine with running your ads on twitter.

I mean just checking the feed these days is incredibly toxic. Seems like only people of a certain mindset kept sticking around.

[–] ikiru@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I mean, Walt Disney might not have actually minded this.

[–] conderoga@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Advertisers need to see more articles like this. Pulling the ad dollars away from Twitter is the last lever anyone has to try to change it, and it should have happened long ago at this point.

[–] Oxossi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter must be held responsible for the kind of Nazi content its allowing on their site.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They are. People are leaving in droves. Advertisers are abandoning the site.

[–] WhatASave@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Don't the ads just run automatically on content? It's not like they're hand picking these as targeted ads for people who enjoy neo-nazi propaganda.

[–] ghariksforge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most ads are targeted these days. You tell which user profiles to run ads to.

Also appearing next to controversial content is brand damage for these companies. They try to avoid it as much as possible.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With how the Overton window is shifting far to the right, I’m not sure companies really care anymore if their content is placed next to hateful shit. As long as it generates money it is acceptable.

[–] LostCause@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol I can just imagine them sitting in some dystopian marketing brand meeting analysing target demographics… "It seems one of the biggest growing demographics is young Nazis who now call themselves "alt-right", so Jenny, any ideas on how we can tailor our content to appeal to even more Nazis, while also not upsetting our main demographic of centrist customers who prefer to ignore all politics?"

[–] federico3@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

This is pretty much what already happens, with the main difference that the target group would have a codename or a number. Algorithms don't care.

[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It used to not reflect on the advertiser, but ever since advertisers started demanding more control over where their ads were displayed, the expectation is now that they all do it. So allowing your ads to be displayed in those places is now interpreted as an endorsement of that content.

[–] Rosriv@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At this point, still using Twitter is like being on Reddit, I can’t say which one is worse.

[–] ram@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Much as I hate jailbait hufflepuffman, twitter's worse.

[–] GreatBigJerk@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago

I mean Reddit isn't a predominantly right wing platform (yet)

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

They are democratic decisions adjusted to the majority of the current remaining users of Twitter.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Just like Reddit is trying to do. Monetizing hate is profitable apparently.

[–] S4nvers@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine contacting a company as a journalist for comment and getting a poop emoji as a response

Twitter is almost as big of a shitshow as Reddit is

[–] LostCause@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was clear to me when Musk unbanned the Neo-Nazis and there was many articles about it like: https://techcrunch.com/2022/12/02/elon-musk-nazis-kanye-twitter-andrew-anglin/?guccounter=1

So, seeing as even I could predict that 6 months ago, why the fuck are these companies still running ads there? Do they want this?

[–] xevizero@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do they want this?

Apparently they have no issues with nazis, but the moment you mention a minor slur in a youtube video you will be demonetized into oblivion, and don't even try showing some skin or they will call the FBI.

[–] 100beep@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

They demonetize the slightest thing because that way they don't need to pay anyone for the money they make...

[–] jason@social.mrnf.me 1 points 1 year ago

@xevizero @LostCause its a matter of how you define "free speech". Its better to filter out than ban.

load more comments
view more: next ›