this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
198 points (98.5% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7703 readers
13 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] albinanigans@kbin.social 68 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yanno what? Good for them! Not only for swiftly defederating at their discretion (which I support, full stop) but also this open dialogue that is happening.

People forget that defederating can be reversed, but it requires communication and cooperation for that to be an option.

[–] tox_solid@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

This is a good take. I find it strange that beehaw would be cast as the villains in this situation when an open line of communication exists between the admins with the tentative goal of refederating.

[–] jdp23@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Exactly!!!!!

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I would like to thank /u/thedude for having an open dialogue with other instances.

Edit: (how) can I link to a user? @TheDude /u/TheDude

[–] Tempiz@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

Great to hear that there is a dialog open between the admins. Hopefully it is all sorted swiftly. Federating with all of the large instances is important for the continued growth of the platform.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago

cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/594843

hey folks, here's a quick update on our decision to defederate from sh.itjust.works! (and here's sh.itjust.works's side of this update)

we got in touch with the head admin over there, The Dude, and we had a pretty good chat about our concerns and reason for defederating. while immediate re-federation is just bluntly off the table with the rudimentary state of Lemmy's moderation tools, we now have a pretty good idea of the roadmap to refederating with them. we think we'll eventually be able to do this, although we don't have a timetable on when yet.

we're also now collaborating with him on how to move forward--and in the weeks and months to come we'll be pushing to expedite the process of developing some of the necessary tools. this decision has really helped us make connections that can hopefully realize those tools both on the desktop side and in apps being developed for Lemmy. we're also hoping to collaborate with other Lemmy administrators who have needs like our own, or just generally want more granular tools at their disposal.

we did also get in touch with the lemmy.world owner prior to defederating to share the concerns that prompted us to defederate[^1]--but we have not received any communication from him since it was levied, so there's no roadmap at all there as of now. we're always open to reconsidering and collaborating to end the defederation with him, but for now the earliest i can give you is "when mod tools are in a better state".

that's all for now folks. if any new significant developments take place we'll announce them as needed.

[^1]: we're only bringing this up now because it was just not useful information in the context of our announcement. it almost certainly would have been interpreted as some sort of callousness and/or brought unnecessary sectarianism and grief to him. at the end of the day he has his reasons and desires for running lemmy.world how he does, and we have ours for running Beehaw as we do. because of social and technological circumstances those are just incompatible right now, and that's fine.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (25 children)

Why did Beehive decide to defederate?

[–] Xathonn@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Since lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works didn't have any restrictions on making accounts they were getting a lot of trolls coming from those 2 instances so they defederated from them until the moderation tools become more advanced.

[–] onceuponaban@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Given that kbin (or at least kbin.social) generally doesn't have restrictions on making accounts either I would assume we're next, eventually.

[–] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

And if they do, nothing of value is lost.

The community in Beehaw are all cool people, but their weird rules and heavy filtering puts me off.

Beehaw admins give me vibes of a power-hungry reddit mods or overbearing parent who thinks they know better than me.

I'll stick with other instances that allow adults to speak with adult language. I'm sick of the fucking nanny caretaker censoring bullshit that forums tend to eventually become.

[–] onceuponaban@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can understand the value of making your community a more tight-knit one with a proactive stance on moderation, that's how Tildes operate and they're doing fine. The thing is I'm not sure I understand why, given this goal, Beehaw is part of the Fediverse in the first place, where there isn't much preventing someone from an outside group coming in. This sounds like a case where a centralized instance makes more sense. Maybe they're trying to see if such a community can exist on the Fediverse, in which case fair enough, but this seems like an uphill road.

[–] finder585@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The community in Beehaw are all cool people, but their weird rules and heavy filtering puts me off.

Not surprising. From looking around it seem like they want to turn beehaw into a business they can profit off of in the long run.

https://beehaw.org/post/452132

in the very, very long term, we aspire to become a co-op or similar, as a part of fulfilling our ethos.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Otome-chan@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is what all us kbinauts were thinking and a few of us asked beehaw and their response was literally "who are you? we don't even think about you" lol. so I think we're probably fine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Denali@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure we'd live somehow

[–] albinanigans@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

If it comes to that... It is what it is!

I don't need big instances directly piped into my vein to have a good time on the internet.

[–] Timboflex@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They only have 4 admins and don't allow users to create communities. It's highly curated, but also can't handle the influx of users from other instances until they have better mod tools, or change their position.

[–] darcy@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The solution was to ask for more volunteer mods, not the nuclear option.

Its surpassing how much they want to control what other people see.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] finder585@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Sounds like they just need to add a few temp mods.

[–] Bojimbo@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

From my understanding, with the slew of new users on lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, moderating comments and posts that were against Beehaw community rules (largely because of bigotry and harassment) became more or less impossible. While there has been an overall explosion in new accounts across the fediverse, almost all of their time was moderating users from those two instances. They were not able to find a compromise using the current mod tools, so went with the nuclear option while they figure out new solutions.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] thatfuckinglinuxguy@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I find it a bit ironic how so many people are pointing out how "growing is important to federation" specifically in reference to this... but at the same time, beehaw are one of the few sites that are against growth (as can bee seen by their requiring to get approved in order to join their server... which IMO is no better or worse than tilde's invite requirement)... and, given the timing, it would seem that they are against hosting reddit refugees in particular.

Yes, you can claim it is for keeping beehaw's site stable or curating users or plenty of other more palatable reasons. But at the end of the day, you are still turning users away. I have a lot of respect for kbin not closing its doors to new users, despite the load it is placing on their infrastructure.

Personally, I wouldn't mind one bit if kbin/beehaw were defederated from each other (not advocating for it, just saying I wouldn't care whatsoever if it happened on its own)

[–] noodlejetski@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

they're not against growth, it's just not their priority and they don't want to achieve it at any cost.

[–] skulblaka@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Which, honestly, I respect. If you know you can't support growth then don't push for it. Huge props to Ernest for dealing appropriately with the growth of kbin.social but I also approve of Beehaw's approach - namely: we aren't ready for that kind of growth right now so we aren't going to let it happen.

I expect something similar will have to be put in place here at kbin as well sooner or later. Eventually we will run up against a limit of what Ernest can do being but a single man with but a single pair of hands.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Salt@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

You can be for growth and against unchecked growth. The two are not the same.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Faendol@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

When I first read about the defederation I had a knee jerk angry response but after thinking about it I really feel like it makes sense for them. They want to have a heavily moderated space and it's hard to do that when you integrate with the other communities. It seems to me they have a level head and are approaching this carefully. I hope that they end out being in the minority but I can understand having a few relatively solitary groups with a focused goal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good news. Im on lemmy.world but I'm sure it will work out. As there is no corporation the users and admins can collectively work on share and own the tools for moderations.

Exactly. The improved moderation tools will help everyone and there is no reason to keep it to one instance because of the non-profit nature of the fediverse (so far). Good stuff!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danknodes@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

This alyaza character seems like a real gem. I'm imagining all the curious refugees checking the place out for the first time, seeing all of this censorship irony, and promptly going straight back to reddit.

and the paragraphs and paragraphs of intentional lowercase. at least, as an admin, they seem very engaged with the community.

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The transparency is refreshing.

load more comments
view more: next ›