this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
283 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So for those not following VA politics, I'll do up a bit of a TL;DR:

Pre-Nov-2023:

  • Governor: Republican
  • Legislature: 1 house was Dem, 1 house was Republican
  • Abortion was used to try to drum up support to make both legislative houses Republican in the Nov 2023 elections (among other things)

Nov 2023 elections happen.

  • Plan backfires. Dems get both legislative houses, but Gov seat is still Republican.

New Legislative session starts for 2024.

  • Republican filed a bill to remove funding for abortions
  • Dems were like "lol no", wanted to bring a floor vote on the bill to get votes recorded on where everyone stands on it
  • Republicans tried to revoke and water down bill, Dems were like "lol no"
  • Dems forced the bill to floor vote
  • Almost every single Republican decided to vote "no" on bill, so it failed by 97 votes (out of 100).
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 80 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just another episode of the GOP's fascist clownshow.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Not really, the GOP didn't get far at all in their shenanigans here. The national Dems could learn a thing or two from this...

If this was the normal clownshow, the Dems would roll over and be like "it's time for unity and reconciliation" or whatever crap they push.

[–] Decoy321@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is a disingenuous take, considering the important distinction between these state Dems and the national Dems:

These guys have majorities in their houses, and thus have significantly more political power. The national Dems don't.

[–] cosmic_slate@dmv.social -1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This is a disingenuous take

No it isn't. The national Dems are just incredibly ineffective and leadership pushes the bare minimum. Like the national party, Virginia has it's share of Democrats that are conservative and take issue with broader party goals too.

Let's look at the legislature make-up:

Virginia Senate: 21D-19R

Virginia House of Delegates: 51D-49R

There is very, very little room for defections.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 12 points 7 months ago

Yeah this is how you let Republicans self-own, not by trying to pass a draconian border bill that expressly appeases fascists' sensibilities. It's far better and easier to drag their asses out into the open, show how awful they are, and then deny them.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 76 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Griffin then faulted Democrats for turning his bill into a “circus,” saying he supports exceptions for the life of the mother but was never afforded a chance to amend the legislation to reflect that.

Either you oppose the provisions you wrote into your own bill, or your don't. Can't have it both ways, Grif.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 7 months ago

Right!? Like, you wrote the damn thing, if those are your thoughts, put them in there to begin with!

Dude acts like someone stole the rough draft off his desk.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Del. Marcus Simon, D-Fairfax, said it’s not uncommon for lawmakers to have their own bills turned against them.

“It’s happened to me. I’ve had some bad ideas before,” Simon said. “You put those bills in, and anything can happen. And you’ve got to be willing to deal with the consequences.”

[I want to believe that’s] refreshingly honest!

[–] Willy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

seems like maybe someone should review it before they turn it in. these people are making law and seem to do it with very little care.

[–] BagelEmbezzler@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

That's what the debating and voting is for, no?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

this sounds like the polar opposite of kentucky

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If there’s any places worth being the polar opposite of, Kentucky would be near the top of that list.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We still have a Dem governor. There are plenty of states farther south that are completely under fascist control. We didn't, for example, pick a fight with the federal government or the Walt Disney Co.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I will totally concede that point. I mean, it sorta falls in the same category of “Thank god for West Virginia,” but it’s a very reasonable observation.

Although to be honest, if forced to relocate to any state down there, I’d probably just emigrate to Portugal.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Oh no doubt. I'm not saying Kentucky is good, just that it's probably one of the better red states right now.

Which, uh.... Isn't really a ringing endorsement.

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Seems like an "I Was Here" kind of bullshit vote. Fuck these GOP ass clowns for wasting everyone's time and money though.

[–] yuriy@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

“I will not allow these babies and these mothers to be politicized” said Griffin, while actively politicizing those babies and those mothers.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Democratic majority didn’t allow Griffin to cancel his own legislation. That prompted a warning from Del. Bobby Orrock, R-Caroline, who said the body was breaking with its longstanding tradition of letting members retake control of bills that have gone “totally awry.”

“Understand the consequences that may come home to roost for all the rest of us,” Orrock said, adding that in his 35 years of House service he was aware of just one instance that Republicans had done the same thing to a Democrat.

I suppose this was a trade-off, then. Wonder if it will come back to bite in a future session or not.

[–] cheesebag@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Facing The Consequences of the Bill You Yourself Proposed is good actually, and should apply to both parties, yes.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

You know how bugs are expected in computer programming? I wonder why this was a long-standing tradition for lawmakers - maybe there’s something I don’t understand.

On the surface it definitely sounds whack to me, I definitely agree.