this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
140 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) downplayed former President Donald Trump’s alarming remarks about urging Russia to “do whatever the hell they want” to other NATO countries.

“He doesn’t talk like a traditional politician,” Rubio said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” with Jake Tapper. “We’ve already been through this. You think people would have figured it out.”

At a Saturday rally in Conway, South Carolina, Trump, a NATO critic, said that the alliance was “busted” until his presidency. Trump also recounted a discussion with an unspecified “president of a big country,” specifically claiming he would support a Russian attack against members that didn’t pay enough for defense spending.

“No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want,” Trump, who has, ironically, been scrutinized for not paying bills, said.

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

"Little Marco" loves sucking up to the guy who called him "Little Marco."

[–] dharwin@kbin.social 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“He doesn’t talk like a traditional politician,” Rubio said Sunday

That's right, he talks like a fucking moron, because he is a fucking moron.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If it talks like a traitorous piece of shit, and sells classified documents like a traitorous piece of shit, it’s probably a traitorous piece of shit.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Let's dispel with this fiction that Marco Rubio doesn't know what he's doing. He knows exactly what he's doing.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Republican Pick-Me's are gross.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sunday: Trump: I shit my pants!

Monday: Trump Defender: He didn't really shit pants. <= We are here.

Tuesday: Trump: I shit my pants more than anyone else, and anyone who says otherwise is a fucking idiot!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wednesday: Facing pressure from their pants-shitting base, every Republican in Congress purposely shits their pants at a press conference

Thursday: Trump's poll numbers go up because he got them to shit their pants

Friday: I drink even more.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Saturday: After a vicious wave of diaper rash cripples their representatives, Republicans accuse Democrats of deliberately allowing them all to shit their pants.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sunday: Democrats apologize for not preventing the Republicans from getting diaper rash, offer to subsidize diaper rash ointment.

Next Monday: Republicans reject Democratic ointment as a deep state conspiracy, use bleach instead. Viral videos of people pouring bleach on their enflamed groins are posted to Parler.

[–] LocoOhNo@lemmus.org 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Republicans will tell you that Trump "Says what he means" until he says something that might interfere with the money they're fleecing from millions of Americans

After that it's always "That's not what he meant..."

Same as the Christian apologists that will make something up out of whole cloth when what the Bible actually says undermines what they're saying about the group they hate this week.

Cowards and liars, the lot of them.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It is actually really hard to meet the definition of treason as defined in the constitution but mango boy did it.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago

For no other reason than to test what should be happening to this traitorous fucking rat, I wish we could sort of “copy” Trumps situation into a normal person. A normal person with all his legal/financial problems, accusations, the evidence against him, etc. I just want to know what would happen if the law wasn’t a two faced bitch. Because I can almost guarantee that, without the cult of personality or the political backing, republicans would be calling for this normal person to be swinging in the gallows.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Great link. Beau is a wonderful gentleman.

[–] crazyCat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Is it just me or do his ears look massive in that picture?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Trump missed the chance to call him "Dumbo"

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Little Marco the foreign relations "expert"

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Hey give him a break, he was probably just really dehydrated.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

If you can’t believe what he says, then what do you support him based on?