this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
143 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2796 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sounds as though instances need a permissions or one-way blocking system so that users can still read content while losing their posting priveledges. This would be at the risk of making the whole federation thing even more confusing, of course.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This sucks as I am a member of many Lemmy.world subs

[–] reric88@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I hear you. Make an alt account for those. Slightly inconvenient, but the pros outweigh the cons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Username@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am a moderator on the lemmy.world sailing community through my Beehaw acct. Will this affect that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ipha@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I strongly disagree with this decision -- as lemmy progresses and stabilizes, open registrations will become normal and just blocking open instances will not be a viable solution.

I can't say if this is just a need for better mod tooling or a fundamental problem with federation, but it's certainly concerning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fancypants@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Does this mean that Beehaw users can't access other instances?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] amortized_cost@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I've been lurking this place for quite a few days now and I realized that this place is heavily censored beyond my comfort zone. It's perfectly fine. Just not for me. Goodbye. I won't miss you just like you won't me.

[–] UnitCircle@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

Well I was worried, but I can still access the communities I'm subscribed to from those instances so I can appreciate this more.

My biggest issue with Reddit has been the lack of nuanced discussion. Everything is just black or white. If we can keep that element out of this instance I'll be happy.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space

Fully agreed. I'd personally rather have less overall content, if it means that the sense of community remains strong.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

I foresee a problem one day in the near future where users from certain instances get referred to links to content that they can't interact with, which... may ruffle a feather or two.

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You will probably end up disconnecting yourself from every growing instance until you're standalone. A standalone Lemmy instance, what even is the point ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Tordoc@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Completely agree with this decision, and it actually comes as a bit of a relief; I saw a statistically significant number of lemmy.world users who admitted to being denied from Beehaw because they didn't want to "write an essay" or aggressively disagreed with the disabled downvotes (something that I've grown to appreciate).

I'm expect that the large influx of disruptive users is from the reddit migration, and I'm hopeful that the majority of the users will either adapt to the culture we're trying to build here, or find their own niches in other communities. As you noted in your post, and in my own experience moderating real life groups, allowing a disruptive influence in a safe space can have serious negative effects on group cohesion that can persist for a long time, if it doesn't alter the culture outright.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Owaissa@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Plenty of responses here but adding mine in the spirit of open discussion. I appreciate this step. Was starting to see too many posts that I didn’t want and worried that this was going to do the way of other socials I’ve already left. I’m looking forward to tracking the growth of the fediverse and appreciate the thoughtful approach.

[–] pterodactyl@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I totally get this, the quality of experience on kbin tanked when federation was brought back up because of those instances, I might move over here yet

[–] Master@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is disappointing considering how popular some of the beehaw communities are (for instance beehaw.org/c/gaming) and now they have been completely ostracized from part of the lemmy community. Or at least the fastest growing part. (mostly because they have open registration). Personally I think this will only hurt the platform as a whole and fragment further, what is by nature, an already fragmented community.

I get why it is being done though. Especially with there being no verification for those servers. They become easy ways to make troll accounts.

Lemmy needs better federated mod tools to say the least (or so it appears to be). There has to be a better way to do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reverendsteveii@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Love that this instance has decided to stick to its guns and take actions that support the mission as a first priority. The nature of the fediverse is such that anyone who wants the content can still go get it, it's as simple as another bookmark in your browser, and this space can remain bully-free. 100% support this decision, well done.

[–] edo@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, given your goals for Beehaw. Thanks for articulating your POV so clearly.

[–] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good on ya. I've already blocked several communities from those instances simply due to the sheer volume of low effort content.

[–] LemmyAtem@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The 196 community on shit just works was literally like half of the posts on the all filter yesterday before I blocked it.

Also blocking communities RULES. What a great feature! Like regardless of why, there are tons of things on the internet that I just have no interest in whatsoever! It's cool to be able to very easily filter that stuff out.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cryst@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean that sucks. I'm subscribed to the ginger community...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] reric88@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I'm a new user so I my opinion shouldn't weigh as much as regulars, but here it is anyway.

I support this decision. Some people may jump to it being censorship which just is not the case. They have the freedom to go there if they want to. It's like keeping enablers out of alcoholics anonymous. The AA member can go get booze if they want to. But the enabler shouldn't be allowed inside. If they want in, they need to get in like the other members, not just waltz in through the door while on a kick.

I like this place. I currently feel like it's a great place, and the fact you guys make decisions like this reenforces that.

[–] wxboss@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

I made a comment earlier that I was disappointed by this decision, but after looking through other instances, I have changed my mind and now approve of this move. I'm glad to be here on beehaw where the integrity of the community comes first and is guarded with the best of intentions.

[–] tookmyname@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems a bit much. Get moderators.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Limeade@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope we get the ability to block instances on the user level, too, like we can on Mastodon. I tried looking for a way when sh.itjust.works blew up because I had a feeling it was going to attract a lot of impolite trolls just for the fact that they would have profanity in their domain name. It comes across as a bit antisocial to me.

I'm sure some people picked it because they thought it was silly word play rather than offensive, but it's not like there's an easy way to parse out the easily amused people from the ones who are out to push boundaries.

[–] snorkitty@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago

Also, thank you for providing a safe space for neurodivergent folk to connect.

[–] nivenkos@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This does much more harm than good IMO - splintering the community at such a sensitive time of growth is a bad idea.

Hopefully there'll be the ability to block images in comments and posts, and better tools for blocking / detecting spammers, and cross-instance bans, auto-moderating hyperlinks, etc. soon.

But the demand for unilateral access to other communities' content is disturbing. The Lemmy federation works because of reciprocity.

Definitely won't be recommending beehaw for new users now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›