this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
161 points (98.2% liked)

Games

16399 readers
994 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kingshrubb@lemmy.world 69 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The government "complains" about megacorps tells you everything you need to know about who sets the rules around here.

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Couldn't have said it better myself. I'm so tired of this system.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

It's not "the government". It's one specific agency of the government. The courts are more "the government" than the FTC is, and they're the ones who approved the acquisitions.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The FTC has complained about the acquisition literally every step of the way. Not really surprising that they're complaining about this.

"In continuing its opposition to the deal, the FTC ignores the reality that the deal itself has substantially changed. Since the FTC lost in court last July, Microsoft was required by the UK competition authority to restructure the acquisition globally and therefore did not acquire the cloud streaming rights to Activision Blizzard games in the United States. Additionally, Sony and Microsoft signed a binding agreement to keep Call of Duty on PlayStation on even better terms than Sony had before." -Microsoft

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 22 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why people are down voting you just because they don't like the government. The FTC legally fought this every step of the way: https://www.ftc.gov/legal-library/browse/cases-proceedings/2210077-microsoftactivision-blizzard-matter

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I don't know why people are down voting you just because they don't like the government.

You must be new to Lemmy, but the voting system on Lemmy is even more of a wild west than Reddit's was/is. I can only guess that is because of the significantly smaller userbase, so biases and other factors are more easily visible through votes. Smaller sample pool makes smaller voices much louder and such.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm not new to Lemmy. I was just venting my frustrating against this attitude.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

It is a disappointing facet of Lemmy, for sure.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If only there were some regulatory body the government had that could set things right!....right?

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Oops! Open your Kinder Surprise to find they’re captured inside.

[–] paultimate14@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Lol the Microsoft response is just trying to distract the court by saying "hey look at this other stuff we are doing that isn't anticompetitive"

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Unmerge them!