this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

Patient Gamers

8927 readers
1 users here now

A gaming sub free from the hype and oversaturation of current releases, catering to gamers who wait at least 12 months after release to play a game. Whether it's price, waiting for bugs/issues to be patched, DLC to be released, don't meet the system requirements, or just haven't had the time to keep up with the latest releases.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I've never played any of the Diablos, or met anyone who has. But they are obviously popular for a reason. Are they worth going back to the first one?

Edit: Thanks for the answers, the community is alive! Based on you recommendations it looks like I'm going to give 2 resurrected a try.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] usernotfound@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You should give Path Of Exile a shot. It's very much like Diablo, but it's free to play (just pay for cosmetics).

[–] alternative_factor@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

PoE is a fantastic game but for beginners learning builds and stuff can be challenging, if you aren't afrai of guides or just want to piddle around without one for free you can really learn what the Diablo series is like.

[–] usernotfound@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It's been a while for me, but I never used a guide when I played. If anything, that took the fun right out of it for me, because it felt like in order to properly play the game, I first had to grind the game.

To each their own of course, but for me the most fun was when I first played the campaign and the whole story and settings /enemies was new. Playing through the campaign again and again on higher difficulties never could hold my interest for long. But I know that's the main draw for a lot of players.

[–] cowvin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but they aren't fun if you run into cheaters. They're a blast if you play with some of your friends. There are other similar games too, so I recommend you give the whole genre a shot.

[–] progenyofthestars@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

You're in for a treat, start with Diablo 1.
Thanks to it's color palette, it's still very atmospheric, even today. There's HD mod that not only makes it no hassle to run this on modern PC with higher resolution but also adds ton of content that was originally cut from the game. It even adds re-imagined cut content that was only just mentioned somewhere in-game or was planned for Diablo 1 but actually ended up being part of Diablo 2 later on. Purists will whine about too many balance/item changes, it's worth it to try the game firsthand.
https://mod.diablo.noktis.pl/download

[–] SoggyHotDoggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’ll throw my vote for Diablo 3. The game can be wicked addictive. I got the platinum trophy on PlayStation which was no quick feat. I just couldn’t stop playing. I would suggest choosing the Crusader to play as first. Super fun and has these flails that are specific weapons to his character. I had so much fun with the Akkhan armor set and the legendary flail called Fate of the Fell. Can take you well into the torment difficulty levels. Chef’s kiss of a game. I think people should really give it a chance if they like the Diablo style of game at all.

[–] GigaFlop@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I only ever played diablo 2, but I had a lot of fun playing it!

[–] BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you like action RPGs, diablo 2 is the game that made it into what the genre is today for the most part. It's practically a perfect game from a fundamentals and gameplay standpoint (meaning it's perfect at what it aimed to do and the impact it's had, not that it's without flaws). I have never been as into AARPGs as my friends, I burn out on them too quickly usually, and I don't have the patience for the grind. But for people who like that style, it's the OG. Its probably the first game I ever sunk more than 100 hours into, but those are rookie numbers for AARPG vets.

Diablo 1 is fantastic, but is very dated at this point. Partly because Diablo 2 improved on damn near everything.

Diablo 3 was...fine. I played through it twice when it launched and I've never touched it again. It was/is insanely popular but it wasn't for me.

I haven't played 4 and personally don't plan to, but it seems like people really like it so far! I'm not against it by any means, I'm just not into the seasonal content type games, and I really prefer to play single player, and I play offline a ton. I can't keep up with the grind or the time commitment, but wish the best for those that can and enjoy that game style.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 0 points 1 year ago

I’ve played 2 and it’s amazing. check out the reissue. Diablo 3 was fun. That’s about it.

[–] pezhore@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having sunk tons of time into D3, I can say it's worth a look. The paragon leveling system from D3/D4 is a clever way of rewarding players who keep playing well after the main 3 (or 4 with D3 DLC) acts. I think I was at Paragon level 1100 or so when I stopped playing.

The biggest complaint people had about D3 IIRC was it's too colorful (something they poked fun at with the Whimsydale/rainbow goblin).

D2 was a favorite in college, but admittedly I never played outside of some lab parties.

D4 is shaping up to be a solid game, but this is patient gamers, so I don't know if that counts.

[–] zkikiz@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh no, how dare a game known for its dark visuals make use of the whole spectrum lol. If that's the highest critique then it's gotta be the best dungeon crawler of all time

[–] pezhore@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

:D I know right? I didn't pick up D3 at launch because of their store/always on DRM (which were two more legitimate concerns), but when I finally joined in after the first expansion I could not for the life of me understand the, "it's too colorful" complaint.

Plus Whimsydale is bonkers awesome - slaying demon rainbow unicorns and teddy bears is a blast.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't recommend going as far back as the first one. Diablo 2 Resurrected came out last year and is a good starting point for the series if you're thinking about trying it out. I never got into 3, but so far 4 feels really good.

[–] panchzila@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks! I'll look for resurrected then. If you don't mind replying, what is with the massive appeal of the game?

[–] MrAegis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You have to remember that this game came out a long time ago, it had many features at the time that set it above other games.

It had a good storyline, multiplayer, maps that would change every time you logged in (multiplayer), the ability to be powerful after spending a lot of time in the game (and if you saw anyone with a rare/cool looking armor you know they worked for it, there were no lootbox mechanics where you could just pay money for it). And of course... there is no cow level ;) The skill tree allowed for tons of different abilities and combos, or you could grind away at a single skill and become godly with it.

You may not recognize the appeal to the game now just because so many of the mechanics have been copied and implemented in countless other games since then.

load more comments
view more: next ›