Currently the admins have to curate this for you through federation, although you can try and whack a mole individual communities from an instance. Heaps of people are asking for user level control of blocking instances and I hope it comes soon as there's a couple instances I keep seeing federated into my feed that I find abhorrent, and this growth phase of Lemmy means new communities on those instances keep appearing.
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
6 points (80.0% liked)
Lemmy
12444 readers
16 users here now
Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.
For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah user kevel control for instance blocking is something we need unless instances start sharing defederation lists.
Blocking communities isn't the same because it only hides posts and not the bad users interacting elsewhere
That would be a useful feature
You will be able to do this with 0.19.0 release.
Users can block instances
Users can now block instances, so that their communities are hidden from listings. This is done via POST /api/v3/site/block with parameters int instance_id, bool block.
I hear that you can if you host your own instance but that seems kinda technical.
Create your own instance, defedrate, profit.
This should be done on instance level but I'm not sure how I feel about that.
If that is how it's going to be, we will get a lot of small instances with each their own set of instance-blocking-rules. Some want the funny cat gifs instances but not the nazi instances. Some do not want the cat instances but do want the nazi instances but Als not xyz... Mayham
In the end it will probably be like the way we interact with general websites: each user has their own set of websites they have bookmarked. Nobody is going through all the internet websites and sort by new.
Just logoff. Its easy to do.
It'd also be nice if you could pots without federation, or control the federation, to avoid brigading from other instances.