this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
61 points (91.8% liked)

News

23329 readers
3976 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A poster in the southern Spanish city of Seville that depicts a young, handsome Jesus wearing only a loincloth has unleashed a storm on social media, with some calling it an affront to the figure of Christ and others posting lewd remarks and memes poking fun at the image.

The poster by internationally recognized Seville artist Salustiano García Cruz shows a fresh-faced Jesus without a crown of thorns, no suffering face and minuscule wounds on the hands and ribcage. It was commissioned and approved by the General Council of Brotherhoods, which organizes the renowned and immensely popular Holy Week processions ahead of Easter in Seville.

As soon as it was unveiled last week criticism of it went viral on social media and a debate erupted over how a resurrected Christ should be depicted. Many called it a disgrace, inappropriate, too pretty, modernist and out of line with Seville’s Easter tradition.

Spain is predominantly Catholic and church traditions such as marriage, baptisms and religious parades are immensely popular both among believers and nonbelievers. A campaign on Change.org to have the poster of Jesus withdrawn was signed by some 14,000 people from around the country.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)
[–] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Hey if you are going to take the body of Christ in your mouth...

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Nothin’ at all! . . .

. . . Nothin’ at all! . .

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

You want a Jesus movie starring Jared Leto? Because this is how you get a Jesus movie starring Jared Leto.

[–] GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Can't help but notice that no one's mad about him being white, but being hot is out of the question.

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

People really need to drop the whole "people in the middle east in the first century couldn't be white" thing.

2 Kings 5:27 is literally about a subpopulation who have ancestrally passed skin as white as snow.

Lamentations 4:7 is about how pre-captivity there were people with skin like milk and a ruddy appearance.

Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4Q534 is either describing Noah or the Messiah as having red hair.

One of the more fascinating finds in this tomb, one that has not received much attention, was the preservation of a sample of Jewish male hair. The hair was lice-free, and was trimmed or cut evenly, probably indicating that the family buried in this tomb practiced good hygiene and grooming. The length of the hair was medium to short, averaging 3-4 inches. The color was reddish.

The tradition is also really concerned with skin checks and describes what may be skin cancer as its leprosy. Something that occurs at a much higher rate in redheads.

There's even a scene where the eponymous founder of Edom ('red') who is born with hair all over his body and named Esau either because of that hair or the reddish porridge he ate, either gives away or has his birthright/blessing stolen from him by the guy later renamed 'Israel' in the Bible.

There's a lot more to this and the underlying history, but the notion that the middle east was a monolith of appearances and that no one with pale skin or lighter hair were present is preposterous and a modern falsification of historical realities.

Jesus was probably darker skinned and haired than typically depicted, but it is by no means a certainty as it is popularly presented as.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brothershamus@kbin.social 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

But Jesus’ light skin and blues eyes suggest that he is not Middle Eastern but European-born. And the faux-Hebrew script embroidered on Mary’s cuffs and hemline belie a complicated relationship to the Judaism of the Holy Family.

In Mantegna’s Italy, anti-Semitic myths were already prevalent among the majority Christian population, with Jewish people often segregated to their own quarters of major cities.

Oh yeah

[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

You’ve gotta remember that Jesus is half god and as we know god is white.

[–] liquidparasyte@pawb.social 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

SMH the Son of Man can't be a hunk anymore? RIP so many classical European artists

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah he was actually fat, bald, white guy from New Jersey

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Ehhhey hey there fry man. Peace be wit chas or, uh, sumthin

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Handsome, fresh faced, and not especially Semitic.

[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

The ONE thing the bible says about his appearance is that he was average looking

https://christianityfaq.com/jesus-christs-appearance/

[–] PaupersSerenade@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

I was like huh does the Bible really say that? It doesn't use those words, but yeah it says he was born as a baby and then grew physically larger as he grew up

https://biblehub.com/luke/2-52.htm

[–] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

This was average back then! We're actually getting fuglier as a species

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Um that was written by someone who died hundreds of years before Jesus was born.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Fictional character is reimagined and fanboys are annoyed, water is wet.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Throw the nuns and monks a bone. If they can't spontaneously orgasm looking at Jesus' groin and abs, after years of abstentinence, early morning mass becomes a bit of slog. I mean orgasm metaphorically of course, because they're so devout.

I'll quote Saint Teresa of Jesus:

In his hands, I saw a great golden spear, and at the iron tip there appeared to be a point of fire. This he plunged into my heart several times so that it penetrated to my entrails. When he pulled it out I felt that he took them with it, and left me utterly consumed by the great love of God. The pain was so severe that it made me utter several moans. The sweetness caused by this intense pain is so extreme that one cannot possibly wish it to cease, nor is one’s soul content with anything but God. This is not a physical but a spiritual pain, though the body has some share in it—even a considerable share.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

They just wanted something that people would look at and think:

Oh. My. GOD.

[–] brothershamus@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

"Easter poster depicting a handsome, fresh-faced White Jesus prompts criticism in Spain"

ftfy

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I'm an atheist, but I was raised Roman Catholic.

These people that attempt to paint Jesus as some clean cut, light skinned fashion model is some prosperity gospel shit that intentionally glosses over the teachings of Jesus Christ as written in the New Testament.

Jesus had disdain for those that reveled in greed and decadence. He basically told them they wouldn't be welcome in heaven as they were. If Jesus were real, I can't imagine he'd be pleased being portrayed as some stylish, vain douche of means.

If Christians actually practiced the teachings of Jesus Christ of the new testament, I might not have been so quick to run away. That would involve praising selflessness, acceptance of different cultures, and giving till it it hurts, and shunning greed, gluttony, vanity, and self-interest though, so it was always a non-starter.

The teachings of Jesus of Nazareth are just plain wholly incompatible with the modern global economy, which is human civilization's true god.

[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

The urge for power and refusal to admit fault was the reason why I started to doubt Christianity as a whole, despite growing up Catholic.

I can't understand how it can be so easy for some to preach love, acceptance, and hope while simultaneously using such ideas to push hate or fear.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Well considering Jesus is as real as Bugs Bunny I really don't see the issue.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't know about as real. I've seen pictures and movies of Bugs Bunny. I know what Bugs Bunny sounds like. Also, if I do something Bugs doesn't like, he gets revenge. He doesn't send me to a fictional land where I burn for eternity.

Bugs definitely seems more real to me.

[–] the_q@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Fair enough.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (15 children)

There is historical evidence that a man named Jesus existed at the time. Not quite 100% conclusive, but probably as good as it will get when looking for evidence from 2000 years ago.

Whether that human was also divine is a matter of faith, of course. Most scholars who are serious about this make a distinction between the historical Jesus and the divine one from Christian beliefs. The only two events that have this general historical consensus are that the historical Jesus was baptized, and that Pontius Pilate (who most definitely did exist) had him executed. Everything else around Jesus from the Bible can't really be verified one way or another.

Yeah, I got most of this from a Wiki link. So what. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sources_for_the_historicity_of_Jesus

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

*Yeshua

There most certainly was nobody named Jesus in Judaea at the time.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Which comes from the expression "god saves" an expression that was aspirational for the people to be saved from their Roman rulers.

What are the odds that a man who would be the supposed saviour would be named that? About the odds of someone named Dr. Octavious would get 8 limbs.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Actually pretty good since like one out of every six dudes in Judaea was named that at the time.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Even if true that would mean 5/6 were not.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Graphy@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I say we give him like the deepest cum gutters possible.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Bugs Bunny?

[–] Zorque@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure they'll take the opinion of random internet atheist edgelords to heart.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah in Sevilla Easter is THE holiday so I'm sure this is gonna play out fascinatingly well...

[–] lingh0e@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

He's got those swimmers lats.

Rock me Sexy Jesus.

[–] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 1 points 9 months ago

eh, Buddy Christ did it better

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)
load more comments
view more: next ›