this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
157 points (97.0% liked)

politics

18986 readers
3693 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The former president’s PAC are operating as slush funds to help him fight off a mountain of civil and criminal cases

Donald Trump’s PACs spent a staggering $50 million on the former president’s legal defense in 2023, according to a report from The New York Times.

According to two sources who spoke to the Times, the former president’s massive legal bills were paid out through funds from the Save America PAC and the Make America Great Again PAC, his two primary political action committees. The full details of the PAC spending will be made available Wednesday, the deadline for Federal Election Commission year-end campaign filings.

Given the multiple civil and criminal cases leveled against Trump in the last year, the mountain of legal bills is not necessarily a surprise. In August of last year, Save America revealed that it had burned through the majority of its cash-on-hand on Trump and his associates’ legal defenses. The Times reported at the time that Save America had requested a $60 million refund from another Trump-affiliated group to keep itself afloat.

According to the Times, 10 cents of every dollar donated to Trump’s campaign is being directed towards Save America, which in the last year has operated virtually exclusively as a legal slush fund for the former president.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The only thing I find surprising here is that he actually paid any legal bills

[–] whodatdair@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

Lawyers have learned to not work for him without upfront pay

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@aussie.zone 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The influx and outflow converting donations to legal bills would normally be enough of a concern to send major donors and grassroots contributors running for the hills, but it’s having virtually no effect on Trump’s momentum toward securing the Republican 2024 nomination.

This. His supporters just don't care. Whatever it takes to beat the dems.

[–] Toto@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Such an important note. Click bait articles stating trump did something bad, the left opens it up with indignation and wonder if THIS will be the moment THEY realize trump is a horrible person.

They. Don’t. Care.

The quicker the left understands that the better equipped they can be to beat out misinformation, target dollars and organize correctly to make a movement that matters.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I'm not sure the left doesn't already see that. It's the media and politicians pretending that the far right is worth listening to.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Using campaign donations for personal expenses like this is of course super illegal.

If just about anyone else had done it to this degree, their campaign would be over and they'd be facing a seperate trial for it or at the very least the maximum fines available to the FEC.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Silly Rabbit, laws are for Liberals!

[–] ares35@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

PACs have fewer restrictions than campaigns when it comes both getting and spending money.

[–] eRac@lemmings.world 4 points 8 months ago

10% of actual campaign donations have been passed to the PAC being used almost exclusively for legal bills. This is campaign money.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

That may be, but SURELY it's not THIS lax for everyone?

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

I’d imagine Cori Bush has a thing or two to say about this rn

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

That picture is what you see if you look between Putin's legs.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And this sum will only get bigger. Good. For one, it clearly shows what a fraud he really is. And as a bonimus, every cent of his campaign he has to waste on legal troubles is a cent less to spend on campaigning.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Good other than it implies people are still giving him money. I wish someone else would con them out of it for better reasons, like buying a sports car or hiring an actor for a day to tell them, "that's a great idea!" after anything they say.

Paying lawyers willing to defend Trump in court is a horrible use for money.

[–] Alexc@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yes, he may be a heinous criminal, and a traitor to his country, but why is he doing “duck face” in pretty much every picture he’s not speaking in? In those, he looks like a Howler Monkey.

[–] Plum@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

My best guess is its for the same reason as the howler monkey. That's his War Face. It's an active display against all other beta male challengers to show Trumps dominance.

Or his face got stuck like that.

[–] Ersatz86@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

What do we call this one?

This beaut was featured in a HuffPost story recently. Not only is it stupendously, embarrassingly clownish, but an entire team of people selected this image above all others to feature in their article.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Because he has the mentality of a 14 year old girl on Instagram.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Voluntary fucktard tax.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

A more punchable face has never existed.

[–] Stretch2m@lemm.ee 0 points 8 months ago

God I'm so sick of this orange douchebag and his idiotic expressions littering up my feed.