this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
166 points (97.7% liked)

Privacy

31938 readers
833 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CodaChroma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Only in the EU which is typical. I wonder if there will be a way to spoof it for the US

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Oh I'm sure there will be. It will be technically difficult (but not impossible) for them to allow other app-stores and sideloading but have the hardware and software be different enough in both markets to not have some slip through.

I suspect there will be lots of hacky shit for this.

[–] errorlab@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I remember that there was an identifier based on model number. FaceTime wasn't allowed in the Middle East for a while, there was a way to tell if the model will support it based on the last character after the / in the model number. Middle East models won't even have the app at all.

Propably they'll do the same for models sold in the EU.

There are already hardware variants of the same iPhone. I think the US gets an iPhone with all eSIM, and China has two physical SIM slots.

[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

FaceTime wasn’t allowed in the Middle East for a while

But why?

[–] errorlab@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No idea. Could be encryption or to protect telecom companies interests, WiFi calling means bundles need to change.

Most providers are government owned.

Edit: WhatsApp calling is still blocked in the GCC. Users there mostly use Snapchat as an alternative.

[–] chevy9294@monero.town 1 points 9 months ago

I'm sure it will be and I'm also sure Apple will do EVERYTHING to make it almost imposible to do that. They may also block users from using their iPhones if they discover that they are set to EU, but they are actually not in EU.

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sounds like jailbreaking with extra steps

[–] chevy9294@monero.town 1 points 9 months ago

That is just in EU right? So Switzerland (in the center of Europe) won't have that? Interesting...

[–] T0RB1T@lemmy.ca 20 points 9 months ago (2 children)

This is actually huge.

I'm far FAR from an Apple user, but the moment this is available, I'll be seeing if I can install FireFox with µBlock Origin on my partner's phone.

[–] c10l@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

For what it’s worth you can get uBO on Orion browser right now.

Last time I tried to use that browser it was too buggy for me though.

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 11 points 9 months ago

Chrome Engine isn't called Chromium, it's Blink.

[–] Voltage@slrpnk.net 8 points 9 months ago

I wish I was born in europe rn lol. tbh with india's population the gov could try something similar and apple would likely comply to not lose a huge amount of potential consooomers. Android has always been the dominating mobile os here but apple is slowly gaining numbers and they wouldn't like to see the graph go down.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


With iOS 17.4, Apple is making a number of huge changes to the way its mobile operating system works in order to comply with new regulations in the EU.

One of them is an important product shift: for the first time, Apple is going to allow alternative browser engines to run on iOS — but only for users in the EU.

Apple is clearly only doing this because it is required to by the EU’s new Digital Markets Act (DMA), which stipulates, among other things, that users should be allowed to uninstall preinstalled apps — including web browsers — that “steer them to the products and services of the gatekeeper.” In this case, iOS is the gatekeeper, and WebKit and Safari are Apple’s products and services.

Even in its release announcing the new features, Apple makes clear that it’s mad about them: “This change is a result of the DMA’s requirements, and means that EU users will be confronted with a list of default browsers before they have the opportunity to understand the options available to them,” the company says.

Apple argues (without any particular merit or evidence) that these other engines are a security and performance risk and that only WebKit is truly optimized and safe for iPhone users.

But in the EU, we’re likely to see these revamped browsers in the App Store as soon as iOS 17.4 drops in March: Google, for one, has been working on a non-WebKit version of Chrome for at least a year.


The original article contains 596 words, the summary contains 248 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sorry for the devs who had years of nightmares and insomnia to get their browsers to work on this thing

Last news https://alternativeto.net/news/2024/1/apple-has-officially-announced-sideloading-and-third-party-app-stores-for-eu-users/

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Apple: innovating, despite their best efforts