this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
886 points (93.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27066 readers
2378 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

People keep talking about "Federalizing the National Guard" and now you've got other States pledging their NG to Texas in defiance of the Supreme Court (see image).

So is this what CW2 looks like?

P.S. I'm a Brit

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KuroeNekoDemon@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

History is about to repeat itself so you know what? I'm going to sit here north of the border watching you guys burn

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Wait. The first civil war ended? /s

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (7 children)

From what I've heard, the supreme court decision was mostly about the feds having access to the border, and the ability to cut down the razor wire, rather than any specific opposition to the razor wire existing in and of itself. I would wager this whole deal is mostly just a kind of political play, to try and egg biden into doing something stupid, while simultaneously keeping up the appearance that everyone at the head of these states is doing something dangerous, anti-institutional, and counter-cultural, even though they're all kind of inherently unable to do anything along those lines just as a matter of their positions.

Everybody's correct when they say that the political divides in this country are less clear-cut, but I also don't think that the radicalization that we've seen, as a matter of perspective from being in online space, necessarily reflects reality. I think if you look at most people, most people want social security of some kind, and want healthcare of some kind, and want drug legalization of some kind, and want us to stop fighting wars in some form. Those are all kind of generalities, because the specific mechanism by which people want those things achieved differs from person to person. It's very fractured as a matter of course, as a matter of how our political system and society is set up, and the ruling class has taken advantage of this to enact a divide and conquer strategy, where they can selectively promote whatever ideological positions benefit them the most, and cordon everyone off into a relatively small set of solutions over which they have a high amount of control. Rather than, you know, what a good democracy might do, which is come to a compromise solution, that everyone but the most extreme propagandized radicals might be kind of okay with. There is a reason why lots of conservatives like communism, as long as you use the right words. Both parties attempt to be mostly "populist" parties. This is all kind of obvious, right, but people understate the degree to which it's a deliberate thing, and the overstate the degree to which it's been successful, you know, which isn't surprising, because, again, serves the interests of the powerful. People aren't, broadly, morons, people have realized that this is all the case. That's mostly what the "radicalization" that you've seen online has been, people just realizing that they hate these shitass solutions that aren't really compromise solutions. See how everyone is cripplingly disappointed with the democratic party, and also how, likewise, conservatives are consistently disappointed with their own party, as well, and for many of the same reasons, barring the extreme radicals.

Most people are focused on how the internet divides people into radicalized swaths and conspiracy theorists, which is true, but even the mainstream monopolized internet is kind of a good tool for mass mobilization. See the occupy movement and the arab spring for older examples, for more recent examples, maybe the george floyd protests, or the french retirement protests. The only risk of these is kind of that they more easily get co-opted as a result of their visibility, i.e. "defund the police" gets turned into an argument for "fund the police". If you were an asshole, you could cite charlottesville, or jan 6th, for examples of internet mobilization, but those are relatively smaller scales of things, compared to the others, which were more popular, they just got disproportionate media attention relative to their size, and had disproportionate political effects.

I think if we're looking at the true, extreme political radicals, we're seeing them come about as a result of a kind of well-oiled engine. I'm not gonna say that this is an institutional kind of thing, and it's maybe more of a third level effect of active decisions, but it's still something that, nonetheless, has been deliberately constructed. 4chan is funded by a japanese toy company and a hands off japanese internet techbro, and is administrated by some former american military freak who's deliberately organized the site. The more radical offshoots, that use the same source code, tend to be funded by oil money, and political action committees, but through second-level effects, where they fund some small level conservative actor, and then they prop up the space. Which churns out some radical terrorists that are capable of your more fucked up bombings, and shootings, and controlled and coordinated protests. And then you kind of get military people at almost every level of this, in lower numbers, who act to control the space.

I dunno what I mean to extrapolate from all of this, but yeah. There's probably not going to be a civil war.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

Fuck Trump and his shit-headed followers forever.

[–] foreverandaday@lemmy.ml 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ain't no way this is actually going to happen, any attempt at succession will be put down by the much larger national military. There will be no civil war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ratman150@sh.itjust.works 16 points 10 months ago (4 children)

This shit needs to stop. As a Texan (by force...) I'd absolutely be joining the feds to fight against Texas.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I don’t see how the national guard isn’t already federal, it’s the national guard, not the state guard. They get called up just like regular military for wars.

Cut off their money, court martial them, dishonorable discharge, take away their guns and vehicles. These belong to the military, not Texas.

[–] dukk@programming.dev 12 points 10 months ago

National Guard listens to the state by default, as each state has its own National Guard. However, the federal government can intervene at any time and give them new orders.

I guess they’re just choosing not to do anything? IDK.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] swayevenly@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] cashews_best_nut@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for your indepth and insightful analysis. 👍

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago (2 children)

What is curious to me is these are state departments disagreeing, though the previous civil war was fought between federal and state governments with raised armies.

This time I was expecting the police vs. militants. Uncontrolled civil unrest. Portland and Minneapolis but spread across the nation, cranked to eleven.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

We thought we were getting a proper class war and instead we get fascist versus not fascists but they still hate you

[–] BartyDeCanter@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Portland and Minneapolis? So like, a protest/campout in one or two square blocks while everyone else goes about their normal business?

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 14 points 10 months ago

And the same footage of that one or two blocks being ran for over 6 months on loop

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Biden needs to send the army to Texas and arrest Winey Greg.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Weak king, so the local lords smell the opportunity to gain power, tale as old as time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

A lotta people's shitty 2nd amendment logic is about to be tested.

[–] joel1974@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (10 children)

Look how the military treated people in Iraq. Wait until the National Guard gets more involved.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 11 points 10 months ago

Could they not at least bunch up a bit so it's easier to build a wall around them?

[–] LordCirais@pawb.social 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I get that this isn't the point, but this is one of the least-cropped screenshots I've ever seen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Dumbasses once again saying, "Now is the time!" when they're clearly outnumbered and outgunned.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›