this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
22 points (92.3% liked)

News

23305 readers
5390 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Probably...

But giving the billionaires that own them 100s of millions of dollars to renovate them isn't going to work.

It's just funneling taxpayer money to people who don't need it, that money will be better spent given to the people who need it to pay for housing.

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is a good point but I wonder if the increased supply will impact overall prices. There is a lot of used space. I have seen % of free space but not what that means in terms of how many homes this could be turned into. Love to know if we converted all free space how big of impact it may or may not have. I suspect pretty big.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but lots of housing sits vacant right now...

And since these are high prices condos in metro areas... Most people who get them are going to have other homes as well.

Which is why this money would be better used if it went to building affordable homes for people who don't have a home

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That is a good point. The only thing I can think of that will have an impact is if cities demand x% of low costs housing being converted from office buildings. If they are mostly targeting rich buys then yeah…what is the point.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If they are mostly targeting rich buys then yeah…what is the point.

I mean, it seems a safe bet Biden is doing it because people who own billion dollar office buildings tend to make large political donations... So this could just be him funneling them taxpayer money, so they give him less money in donations.

But he says he legitimately thinks this is a good use of taxpayer money and will help the average American.

Like most things Biden does, we have to try and figure out if he's lying about why he's doing it, or just really doesn't understand the problem.

Which is pretty depressing.

[–] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh….Ahahaha. I thought we were talking about Canada. The gov here is not paying to convert, but there are developers planning as these big towers need to find a new life and fast. In theory it should add more supply, but I think we are both agreeing that it likely will not go that way…at least not enough to bring down overall house prices. Real estate is really just about the investment with the homes and offices just tenants or purchasers a distant second. It is about maintaining real estate value above all else. At least in Canada and surely the same in the USA as we are so similar.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Yeah, this article is about US.

But I do think Canada has the same problem.

Per square foot (or however many beavers or whatever Canada uses) expensive housing earns more than an affordable one of the same size.

So developers keep building fancy housing no one can afford that sits empty, while the lack of affordable housing causes homelessness.

It's technically making more housing available, just not for the people who need more housing.

Like if there was a food shortage so the government started subsiding caviar and champagne. Sure, they're helping with food availability, it's just not helping anyone that actually has food insecurity

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Generally speaking: Not without severe quality of life impacts... and dismantling of what few laws we have around that.

Think of the last hotel you saw versus the last office building. Feel free to go check out google maps if you need to.

Back? Cool. You know how the hotel is a weird shape? Maybe it is a narrow rectangle. Maybe you are pretty gosh darned certain it is actually a swastika from above. Whatever. And you know how that office building is a big ass fat rectangle, or even a square?

Yeah. There are severe implications of that. Hotels tend to be "long and narrow" because... you need to make sure every unit has a window. Whereas offices can either have a lot of windowless rooms or a centralized cube farm (or, if you are in a fancy company, an atrium).

Which is the problem. Plumbing can be rerouted. Even drop ceilings can be removed/resolved. HVAC can be rebalanced. But significant portions of those office buildings are just not habitable.

And a lot of those "you need a window" are mostly based in fire safety laws that were learned at great cost to human life. But they also very much contribute to quality of life.

And this is also why a lot of the retrofitted buildings on the east coast tend to be more "luxury condos". You sell someone a quarter of a floor and they deal with the hvac issues. Which will help but... not that much.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're not wrong about the windows. You're not wrong about the luxury premium that is leveraged with these bigger spaces. Too. But I think you underestimate the potential of doing so. Around here, factories and the like are constantly remodeled into residential units, and they sell like hot cakes. They did so too even before when the housing crisis got to its current point.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -1 points 9 months ago

Just to check: Your response was that safety and quality of life should be sacrificed because they sell well? I mean, you're right and that is going to be the end result but I would think we could at least acknowledge that is "bad"

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Not really... I mean, take my office for example... We took up an entire floor of a building, but only had 2 bathrooms, 2 sinks, no showers, no bathtubs, 1 dishwasher, 1 full size fridge and 1 mini fridge.

Technically the space could be carved up into 6 or so apartments, but it would have to be completely re-worked.

And that doesn't take into account things like having to remove the false ceiling. Can't have someone breaking into your space because they climbed over a wall.