this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
139 points (97.3% liked)

politics

18976 readers
4249 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“People will lose their jobs,” the think tank’s president says about federal workers. “Hopefully their lives are able to flourish in spite of that.”

Since taking over the Heritage Foundation in 2021, Kevin D. Roberts has been making his mark on an institution that came to prominence during the Reagan years and has long been seen as an incubator of conservative policy and thought.

Roberts, who was not well known outside policy circles when he took over, has pushed the think tank away from its hawkish roots by arguing against funding the war in Ukraine, a turnabout that prompted some of Heritage’s policy analysts to leave. Now he’s looking ahead, to the 2024 election and beyond.

Roberts told me that he views Heritage’s role today as “institutionalizing Trumpism.” This includes leading Project 2025, a transition blueprint that outlines a plan to consolidate power in the executive branch, dismantle federal agencies and recruit and vet government employees to free the next Republican president from a system that Roberts views as stacked against conservative power. The lesson of Trump’s first year in office, Roberts told me, is that “the Trump administration, with the best of intentions, simply got a slow start. And Heritage and our allies in Project 2025 believe that must never be repeated.”

Non-paywall link

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't worry, the Supreme Court would never allow them to do such brazenly unconstitutional - what's that? The heritage foundation hand picked the conservative majority in the supreme court?

Oh, nevermind. We're fucked.

[–] pingveno@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The Federalist Society handpicked the the conservative majority, not the Heritage Foundation.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Fascist together.

[–] pingveno@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Nah, that's a bit reductive. There's internal dissent within the conservative movement. Not everyone's willing to go full fasc with Trump. A good chunk of the judges that were ruling against him in the 2020 election were Federalist Society members.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 37 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Hate is a strong word...and I hate the Heritage Foundation.

I had an RSS feed of them recently that I had to delete. You know how intellectuals bought into Hitler's vision? That's what Heritage is for Trump's American fascism. They wholeheartedly believe in it and will lie through their teeth to make it happen.

I'm just sayin'...if I lose my job, I'm gonna sign up for Hexbear. net and...uhh...we'll see what happens...

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 33 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Hexbear will tell you that Trump is no worse than Biden. Legitimately, they constantly repeat that. It's insane.

Start making molotovs instead.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I know. They're insane and basically agents of chaos sleeper cells. That'll be me

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They're just trolls who like being contrarians. In 30 years' time they'll be your uncle on Facebook-equivalent making racist posts and Just Asking Questions.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 8 months ago

Hexbear is the septic tank of thoughtless praxis.

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I think that's a lot of people if America becomes a dictatorship. If they think the populace is going down without a fight, they have a whole fucking nother thing coming to them. The only way an American dictator survives the first year is if they're hidden in a bunker underground.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder that, relatively speaking, almost nobody is aware of this. Almost nobody has heard of Project 2025. People literally see Trump as "not that bad".

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Project 2025 is fucking dangerous. They essentially want to make LGBT+ people illegal, indoctrinate school kids with alt-right history propaganda, and remove any climate-focused and environmental-focused regulations. And that's just the beginning.

They're going to take away people's freedoms while dismantling democracy. It's bad.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you go to Darude Sandstorm on Spotify, the guy on the album art is almost identical to the thumbnail of this post.

[–] zuck@lemmy.l0l.city 4 points 8 months ago

DON'T DO TECHNO IT AGES YOU

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

Die in a fire, fash.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Since taking over the Heritage Foundation in 2021, Kevin D. Roberts has been making his mark on an institution that came to prominence during the Reagan years and has long been seen as an incubator of conservative policy and thought.

Roberts told me that he views Heritage’s role today as “institutionalizing Trumpism.” This includes leading Project 2025, a transition blueprint that outlines a plan to consolidate power in the executive branch, dismantle federal agencies and recruit and vet government employees to free the next Republican president from a system that Roberts views as stacked against conservative power.

But I don’t want to dismiss the part of your question about the shift in the conservative movement toward more skepticism, if not restraint, in foreign policy, and I think a lot of that is prudent.

At CPAC last year, he said Hungary is “the place where we didn’t just talk about defeating the progressives and liberals and causing a conservative Christian political turn, but we actually did it.”

We believe it is the proper constitutional understanding of our government, provided — and this is a vital thing for us — that the legislative branch is much more active and maybe even proactive and ambitious in the assertion of its authority.

I know you don’t endorse candidates, but given that Trump is both the front-runner for the Republican Party’s nomination and currently under four different indictments, would a conviction on any of those counts be enough to give you pause that he’s the right person to be enacting Heritage’s agenda?


The original article contains 3,555 words, the summary contains 257 words. Saved 93%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

The problem I see now is that even if Trump loses, they will still push this vision of America.