this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2023
69 points (96.0% liked)

Lemmy

12510 readers
11 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a question about communities. Are communities server-specific, for example, is the "Gaming" community on lemmy.ml different from the one on, say, beehaw.org and will I need to join both?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JackFromWisconsin@midwest.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

That's right. !Gaming@lemmy.ml is different from !Gaming@beehaw.org

Note that you can use your same account to subscribe to both of them, as one may be more active than the other. Feel free to pick one or both it doesn't really matter. Different websites/servers have slightly different rules and different culture, so the posts and comments will be slightly different community to community.

[–] schizanon@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] JackFromWisconsin@midwest.social 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It is different for sure.

The "lemmy-verse" is really just a bunch of separate websites all running the same software that talks to each other. It's like email, where you can send an email from a Gmail account, and receive it on an outlook account. The same concept being applied to social media now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Its different from centralized services, and better. Rather than there being a single universal gaming community, people can make their own, with their own rules. If one gaming community has bad mods, or one server has bad admins, you can move to a different one.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago

If one gaming community has bad mods, or one server has bad admins, you can move to a different one.

One of my favorite features of Lemmy. Makes taking over and astroturfing communities more costly.

[–] testman@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

wait, what about if you have two communities where mods and admins are fine. Are there any options to federate those communities?

all this time I was under impression that communities already federate

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is not a single, god community. Any instance can make /c/startrek, and people can subscribe to both.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only "universal community search" tool that we know of so far, is https://browse.feddit.de/ .

But I'd be very open to adding this type of functionality into lemmy's apps, and this UI too.

[–] 7heo@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] testman@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

yep, that does make sense from security / moderation standpoint, as one "god community" would probably get Bad Apple'd ™ .
but I would argue that "lol just manually opt-in to other communities" could be improved.
I will go search through issues on GitHub to see which of my ideas were already proposed and which still need to be opened 👍

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You can follow both, that's the federation.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] schizanon@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why does "better" always mean "more complicated" on the Fediverse?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It's just how the internet used to work before centralized US tech giants took over all comms platforms. Instead of one site, there are many to choose from.

[–] downdaemon@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Sometimes the best thing isn't the easiest thing

[–] federico3@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Unfortunately that breaks the concept of federation. I expected servers with good relationships with each other to replicate posts, otherwise what's the point of federation?

[–] JackFromWisconsin@midwest.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point of federation (on Lemmy) was to allow the different websites to talk to each other. So your lemmy.ml account can talk to most other websites that run lemmy software. This means create posts on external communities, comments, and be able to follow such communities. For now, the choice was made to keep communities local and not locally federated.

[–] pfak@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

It sounds more like identity federation. I think it's going to be very confusing for a lot of people.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sup@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, thank you!

[–] seppoenarvi@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How can I search for communities across servers that are particularly active on a given topic?

[–] testman@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

O wait, the whole federation allows federation of just users and not communities?
So all this time I have been looking at posts just on the main instance and not posts across all instances?
fugggggggg so now I have to go search for communities of same name on all other instances as well and subscribe to them? ok, fine. How do I do this? there should really be something that automates this process

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

No, communities are the main federated item in lemmy.

For example, !calckey@lemmy.blahaj.zone is also viewable from here: https://lemmy.ml/c/calckey@lemmy.blahaj.zone

[–] Neuromancer@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would argue that "viewable from" is a far cry from truly federated. The fact that I have to subscribe to infinitely many individual communities to see all, say, "Technology" content across all of lemmy seems like a near-fatal flaw to me.

[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The same problem existed on reddit, and it will resolve in the same way. There are often overlapping communities, but ultimately, the users will decide what works, and one or two of them will win out.

[–] Neuromancer@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What's the point of federation then?

[–] floppyslapper@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What’s the point of federation then?

There's not just one server or one entity that controls everything. If one server shuts down it doesn't shut down the entire service. And even though having multiple communities on multiple servers named the same might not be ideal, it's also a feature. If you really don't like the mods of one community on one server, you can join a similar community on a different server. You can think of the servers like cities. Every city has a game store, and this way you can access all the game stores at once. You might have a favorite community on a favorite server and that might be where you create your new posts, but you can still read and participate in the discussions going on in similar communities on all the different servers.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People should really see naming conflicts, not as a negative, but a positive.

If you have two cities that run their own lemmy servers, say Wales and Wellington, they can each have their own !news community, like:

  • wales.lemmy.com/c/news
  • wellington.lemmy.com/c/news
[–] floppyslapper@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

This is a good way of framing the concept.

[–] Neuromancer@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can think of the servers like cities. Every city has a game store, and this way you can access all the game stores at once. You might have a favorite community on a favorite server and that might be where you create your new posts, but you can still read and participate in the discussions going on in similar communities on all the different servers.

Great analogy. One of the great things about the internet of old though, was that you automatically got exposed to all of the ideas out there, not just the ones in your city. :)

[–] floppyslapper@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

That's possible with Lemmy too. Just make sure you select the "All" filter when browsing instead of just the "Local" filter and it should show you all the federated posts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 year ago

It avoids centralisation. You can simply defederate from nazi instances, and the whole platform can't be sold out from underneath you.

And for someone like me, who is trans and runs several instances for the gender diverse community, I'm able to curate the experience so my users don't experience constant hate and aggression. So if someone is posting transphobic stuff that doesn't get actioned on their home instance, I can block that user (or their whole instance) from mine even if I'm not a moderator of the community.

[–] gnoop@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

That or what happens is that everyone goes with their local server's version and the federation isn't as heavily user. At present on lemmy.ml, you're presented with Local by default and you have to actively switch to All to go outside the server. It seems a bit as if they're selling the idea of federation while also not promoting the idea of federation once you're logged in by having 'All' be the default view.

[–] yboutros@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hmm yea I don't like it much either, however, I remember /r/technology got progressively worse and the alternative was just a shittier subreddit with a slightly different name.

Unison would be nice, but it's not so different from reddit come to think of it

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] sup@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Something I noticed. If you visit "All", it contains posts from multiple servers, so that can help with discovery.

[–] whiny9130@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

they are federated in the sense that they're an email-like entity. it's just they're not all merged together I suppose.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

It's not a big deal, as the posts to these communities and thus the communities should be in your ALL tab anyways. As long as someone on your server already follows them.

[–] gnoop@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It's a loose federation of communities. Each server has its own communities that are pushed out. Meaning you can end up with 20 different gaming communities as each one will list the server they're part of. It's not like usenet where the newsgroup name is the same regardless of what server you're on.

[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can have multis, and you can subscribe to multiples at once.

I have about twenty different gaming subs on all different servers subscribed, so I'll see any one of them in my feed.

Does it matter which one posted what I'm looking at?

Not really.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

So that's how you do it. Nice so you can also combine closely-related topics. I do think as a new user (like myself) it's a bit daunting that I can't just subscribe to 1 of each topic but potentially have to go seek out the multiple versions of it on different servers, let alone keep up in case new servers come around.

Maybe there could be a centralized list of multis you can subscribe to and these would be maintained for you, or something like that.

[–] whiny9130@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

So, the way that I figured it, you could have the !something@someserver concept, which I call groups (lemmy calls them communities), and the collision of those (say, !something with no server), would be called "regions" because they'd be several competing communities trying to use a shared resource. Moderation of a region would be a nightmare.

You could probably make a reddit-esque "multireddit" style view that represents the "regions" concept - just know that you are posting to a particular community with particular mods, in the end.

load more comments
view more: next ›