this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
238 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alina Habba repeatedly clashed with New York judge Lewis A Kaplan in court for the former president’s civil defamation trial

Remarks made by Donald Trump lawyer Alina Habba in a recent interview about “faking being smart” resurfaced after she endured two tough days in court during her client’s civil trial for defamation damages.

Ms Habba repeatedly clashed with New York judge Lewis A Kaplan in court on Tuesday and Wednesday, during the former president’s civil trial to determine damages for defaming columnist E Jean Carroll.

These included the response to repeated objections, and her failure to stand up when making them, as well as continuing to petition for a postponement of the trial so that the former president can attend the funeral of his mother-in-law.

After a further attempt of the latter on Wednesday, Ms Habba was issued a sharp rebuke from Judge Kaplan. She responded by asking the judge not to speak to her in that way.

“I don’t like to be spoken to that way. And we are going to be here for several days,” she said. “I am asking your honour to please refrain from speaking to me in that manner.”

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 106 points 10 months ago (5 children)

How is everything related to this man such a fucking joke and HOW IS HE SO POPULAR

[–] grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world 71 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I remember feeling like this in junior high. There was this group of athletic dudes who were mind numbingly offensive to everyone. Shoving people, locker stuffing, knocking books out your hand, tripping kids on stairs... Just constant abuse and scorn on anyone not in their group. And these guys were popular. I won't say every girl liked them because there were lots of smart girls. But a lot of girls liked them and guys thought they were cool, etc. It blew my mind that we weren't all ostracizing them for being obnoxious, abusive bullies.

It was junior high. I get it. I moved on.

But Trump's success brings that feeling back. There's no logic to it. It's a creepy mammalian subconscious need to stay on the good side of the bully so you don't end up targeted. Or maybe you see someone acting like you would like to act but can't get away with it.

I have no idea but I blows my mind every time I think about and I know it's what is wrong with the world. No question about that.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is a logic to it. They demonstrate their power by behaving badly without consequence, and the worse they behave the more powerful they must be. The one thing Trump is right about is that he’s treated very unfairly by the courts.

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How has trump been treated unfairly by the courts?

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 21 points 10 months ago

I think by not having his ass thrown in jail. Very unfair.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It’s unfair, but not unfair to Trump, it’s unfair to the rest of us.

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago

I have lost respect for many people in my life because of this, and their inability to see reality somehow when it comes to this one single issue.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 10 months ago

I guess people see themselves in a dumb guy just coasting through and seemingly succeeding against all odds. Obviously, they didn't get billions of dollars from daddy to enable that.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

How is everything related to this man such a fucking joke and HOW IS HE SO POPULAR

  • His 2016 campaign was initially seen as a joke (Even by Trump, who just wanted to use it to launch his next grift anyway). It essentially became a meme that quickly spiraled out of control. People voted for Trump "for teh lulz" early on, the same way they voted for the 15 year old kid, "Deez Nuts", and other joke candidates. The problem is that unlike those other joke cases, Trump didn't go away once the joke was over. He started winning.

  • He started ramping up the bigotry and racism, and just started spewing out what people wanted to hear. And then when the racists and bigots realized that "one of them" actually had a non-zero chance of winning the primary, they started jumping on board. Then you add in a whole bunch of people who liked everything he was saying but hadn't yet learned that he had no way of actually delivering on his promises, and suddenly you've got the "everyman". The man who's going to "tell it like it is". And he got away with it because nobody had ever peeked behind the curtain, and there was no appetite to do so so long as this man continued telling them what they wanted to hear.

  • Even beyond the dedicated MAGA base, he has been very successful in finding a boogeyman to point to to get even moderate Republicans to begrudgingly support him. If it's not those dirty Mexicans coming up here to take your job away, it's kids who want to pretend to be the opposite sex so they can enter the girls' bathroom and molest your daughter. Or its about a woman who actually has the audacity to want to murder their baby without at least getting the blessing of their local politicians (remember Dr. Oz?) first. Or the gays that are using rainbows to recruit your children. Whatever it is. But Trump knows that if you give a man a "them" to blame for all of his troubles, he'll follow you anywhere. And Trump is a master of blaming everyone else.

  • Having exposed exactly how many racists and bigots are in this country, he was able to start threatening the rest of the party into submission by (correctly) pointing out that those racists and bigots now dictate their political careers and that their choices are to either march in lockstep behind him or commit political suicide. Most chose to either get on board or retire. The rest saw the end of their careers in Congress.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

I ask myself this almost daily.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Come on. We all know why he hired her.

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Because she's externally beautiful? Or because she was one of the only lawyers left willing to work with him?

Either way she is embarrassing herself. It's painful to watch but also I want to see him go down so bad. He tried to say my vote against him didn't count. He's a criminal.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Because she was the only one dumb enough to work without payment up front?

I mean, she’s clearly not his type…

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 33 points 10 months ago (3 children)

No surprise, Trump famously said he doesn't hire people who are smarter than him.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hadn't seen a picture of her until now, but it's really apparent that he hired her because she looks like Melania. I wouldn't be surprised if he's sexually assaulting her.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

I think she might actually be dumb enough to consent.

[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was going to make a comment about how hard it would be to find anyone that dumb and then remembered all the mouth breathing red hats out there.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

And trump lies about absolutely everything without exception, so....

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago (2 children)

She's doing a horrible job at faking being smart.

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

Sometimes it's the imposter syndrome, and sometimes you are an actual imposter.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Maybe she just hasn't started yet! I'm sure this is all a big fake-out and she'll start to pretend to be smart any time now.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The only court Alina Habba is qualified to work at is the mall food court.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No she’s not.

There’s training requirements for how to handle food Safely. Like, ServeSafe courses and stuff

[–] stown@sedd.it 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's my constitutional right to have poop on my fingers while making your sandwich!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ewww.

but I'm sure there's some people that would like that sandwich very much,

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

“faking being smart”

This is everybody connected to Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump.

[–] YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

If you somehow mix up the beginning of that acronym we could just call him SCOTT for short. Sorry, Scotts.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Remarks made by Donald Trump lawyer Alina Habba in a recent interview about “faking being smart” resurfaced after she endured two tough days in court during her client’s civil trial for defamation damages.

Ms Habba repeatedly clashed with New York judge Lewis A Kaplan in court on Tuesday and Wednesday, during the former president’s civil trial to determine damages for defaming columnist E Jean Carroll.

These included the response to repeated objections, and her failure to stand up when making them, as well as continuing to petition for a postponement of the trial so that the former president can attend the funeral of his mother-in-law.

Social media users were quick to return to a clip of Ms Habba during a recent interview on a 4 January episode of the PBD podcast, in which she said she would “rather be pretty than smart.”

Sharing the clip on Wednesday, Ron Filipkowski, editor-in-chief of Meidas Touch, wrote: “Alina Habba proved in court today that this statement is categorically false.”

She later asked the judge “how should I proceed?” when questioning Ms Carroll about tweets she had received and then requested a mistrial on grounds that “evidence had been deleted” – which was immediately denied.


The original article contains 494 words, the summary contains 201 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!