this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
251 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19080 readers
4463 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] keet@kbin.social 42 points 10 months ago

Good. Taiwan may have once been a province of China, but with over half a century of self-rule it is time to stop pretending that this is still the case. Hong Kong is a very good example for what "reunification" would mean for Taiwan even in the best of cases.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (6 children)

China will use this as an excuse to escalate further. More aggression and saber rattling.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 19 points 10 months ago (3 children)

China just had it's extremely entrenched corruption revealed to the world, such that a quickly successful attack on Taiwan is off the table, and they know it. China is in no position to wage war against anyone, and won't be for a very long time.

[–] Username02@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Only in contrast to the combined strength of the US military + allies. They might still went with an invasion If the orange turd ever returns to the oval office, since the window for invasion is closing with economic downturn and demographic shifts and what else, they might not have the opportunity to pull it off again. So don't fail the world now, Americans.

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

Their capacity to wage war is going to severely diminish when they run out of young people

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They were going to do it regardless, if things didn't go their way.

They were going to do it regardless

FTFY

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Oh no, not another final warning.

[–] mynamesnotrick@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

Same thinking here. China already made up it's mind I believe and this is gonna be just another justification to escalate. Sorta like Russia saying "NATO encroachment and nazis torturing Russian citizens". China gonna do something, just a matter of when now.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

None of the parties were People's Republic of China-friendly.

DPP is in favor of a Taiwanese identity and closer ties to the west.

TPP is a newer centrist party between the DPP and KMT that courted the youth vote but also favors more independence from China.

KMT is the old guard that ruled the island for decades, and while they favor "closer ties to China", they're a "one China" party with a twist: there's one China and it's legitimate government is in Taipei. Taiwan's official name is the "Republic of China" and the KMT are the only group still really holding on to the idea that 75 years after they were forced to flee to Taiwan, they're still a contender for the rightful rulers of all of China.

Beijing wasn't going to be happy with any result.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

They will escalate no matter what, but the type will be more obvious thanithe others

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 25 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I wish the headlines would mention that it's a win for the incumbent party:

The candidate for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is current Vice President Lai Ching-te, with Hsiao Bi-khim as the running mate. The DPP has held the Presidency for eight years under the current President, Tsai Ing-we.

https://www.counteroffensive.news/p/we-visited-the-border-waters-between

It generates more clicks to make it seem like an upset, but it's pretty normal to re-elect the incumbent party if things are going reasonably well.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yall seen that new show Ted on peacock?

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 20 points 10 months ago

Good. Get fucked, CCP.

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can't wait for one of the tankies on lemmy to chime in

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why? People here are generally against oppression and colonization.

Unless you're larping that wanting to stop the Palestinians from getting genocided is "Russian propaganda against America".

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nah, there is legitimately a ton of braindead campism on here masquerading as "leftism." The weirdly vocal support for Hamas (not just the plight of Palestinians, I literally have seen people say they will "write in Hamas" in the US election) is just the most recent iteration. Previously it was simping for Russia. For a while it was praising the Taliban.

It's always something. Usually weird purity tests, but rarely actual engagement with academic socialism

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


For many of the millions of Taiwanese citizens who lined up at ballot booths on Saturday, the vote centered on the question of who should lead Taiwan in an increasingly tense standoff with its much larger, autocratic and heavily armed neighbor, China.

At the D.P.P.’s gathering outside its headquarters in Taipei, thousands of supporters, many of whom waved pink and green flags, cheered as Mr. Lai’s lead grew during the counting of the votes, which was displayed on a large screen on an outdoor stage.

And Mr. Ko, the third-party candidate who had sought to appeal to voters fed up with the two established parties, despite falling in the polls, had continued to draw large numbers to his rallies, including nearly 200,000 people on Friday night.

The parade was festive, with candidate vans playing thumping club music, and several supporters dressed in inflatable dinosaur costumes for no apparent political reason.

Before Mr. Lai assumes the presidency in May, Taiwanese people — along with officials in Beijing and Washington — will be watching for any early signs of his approach to China, Taiwan’s biggest trading partner as well as a growing threat to its autonomy.

He has promised to stick with the approach of the current leader, President Tsai Ing-wen: keeping Beijing at arm’s length while seeking to avoid conflict, and strengthening ties with the United States and other democracies.


The original article contains 1,104 words, the summary contains 229 words. Saved 79%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 22 points 10 months ago

several supporters dressed in inflatable dinosaur costumes for no apparent political reason.

This is my favorite part right here 😂❤️

[–] iain@feddit.nl 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

People here seem to think that the parties that want unification are pro-CCP. Taiwan (until now) thinks they are the rightful rulers of China. A decent part of three Taiwanese still want reunification. I'm happy that they don't have that delusion anymore, and I hope China follows suit, but let's not see the situation here too black and white.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A decent part of the Taiwanese still want reunification, but they don't have the delusion of what - being the rightful rulers of China?

You hope China follows suit of what, not wanting "reunification"?

Although "reunification" wouldn't be what happens and would be a bad word for if China took over. It'd probably be more like "forced subjegation".

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Can't be taken over by China if you take over China first. [taps forehead]

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

Most current Taiwanese don't think they're the rightful rulers of China. But, some groups have never completely given up that claim. The official name of Taiwan is the "Republic of China", as in "Republic of all of China, including the parts currently under the control of PRC"

Given that the DPP just won again, I'd say it's fair to guess that more than half the country thinks of themselves as more Taiwanese than Chinese.

It was the KMT that still represented the belief that the rightful rulers of all of China is the exiled government of the Republic of China currently based in Taiwan. But, I think even most KMT voters don't really think they're the rightful rulers of the mainland anymore. They just think of themselves as having a Chinese identity.

If something magical happened and overnight China became a liberal democracy, I think there would be many people in Taiwan who would want to go "home" to China. But, I'd guess it isn't a majority anymore. My guess is that even among the people who think of themselves as Chinese rather than Taiwanese, most of them now consider Taiwan to be home.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

How about a set back for the CCP

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Who's capital is Beijing? It's often how people refer to govts.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

CCP is like CPUSA aint going nowhere bud. Just another party full a politicians

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago

I don't like the title here. That is all.