Green - An environmentalist community

5298 readers

15 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!

RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith

Related communities:

Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

theloneforager@lemmy.ml

Chloe@lemmy.ml

Nuclear power helps bring down electricity prices by 75% in Finland (www.thenationalnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Suoko@feddit.it to c/green@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This plant caused the French company who helped building it, to go bankrupt. Gen 3 nuclear plants looks very expensive to build then. However these kind of plants do not produce any side-product which is good for producing bombs or other radioactive weapon. They have no military support then (and maybe neither government?), compared to gen 2.

https://www.wiseinternational.org/nuclear-monitor/818/french-nuclear-giant-areva-melts-down

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] umrath@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, if you socialize all the costs around it (insurance, waste disposal for the next couple of hundred thousand years, etc.) it's really cheap. If you calculate the true costs, it's pretty much the most expensive way to generate electricity. And it's not renewable either.

[–] Suoko@feddit.it -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You know we live in the west, we're rich by default and we can afford anything we want (but it's actually a poor world) #sarcasm

[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Incredibly expensive (estimated 11 billion €) and years delayed (18 year construction; testing began in 2021). Yet brings down electricity prices by 75 %.

How does that make sense? It can't make economic sense to the constructor and operator.

Maybe you could say French companies and citizens essentially subsidized Finland through contracted building at a huge loss?

Now that it's built better operate it and gain something out of it?

Ref https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olkiluoto_Nuclear_Power_Plant#Unit_3

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago

Its LCOE would probably let us forget it forever. Just think about this: I bet you hear more rumors about non-existant fusion nuclear plants than about olkilioto. Let's focus on renewables.

[–] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Olkiluoto 3, Finland's own Sagrada Família and Star Citizen. It was really frustrating to read news about the plant getting delayed year by year. Especially during winter it felt like moving the goalposts, there always were some kind of "technical problems" with getting the plant deployed. I'm glad that it's over, and so is getting gas from Russia.

load more comments