this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
268 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18894 readers
3599 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Seattle Children’s Hospital filed a lawsuit in Travis County District Court on Dec. 7 against the Texas Office of the Attorney General (OAG), after that agency requested documents related to gender transition policies and any such care provided to Texas children.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 87 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Why in the Kentucky fried fuck is Texas asking Seattle about that.

[–] mandelbrotvurst@lemmy.world 85 points 9 months ago (3 children)

We all know why. I'm just surprised the hospital responded with a lawsuit instead of a "go fuck yourself."

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 50 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It does bring more attention if they drag out the go fuck yourself bit with a lawsuit but they definitely need a huge go fuck yourself with a rake letter here.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

I've got a nice rusty pitchfork they could use in a pinch.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 40 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Both demands include a notice that failure to comply could result in a misdemeanor criminal charge that would carry a $5,000 fine or jail confinement of up to a year.

It sounds like the state could imprison the hospital’s personnel if they ever traveled to Texas (or any other jurisdiction that might jail them on Texas’ behalf).

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yeah I said that this was the inevitable outcome of RvW being overturned. It's a matter of time now. The line of the ensuing civil war will be drawn over these state extradition agreements, and if a Republican ever gets the presidency again they will use the feds to forcibly extradite doctors to Texas.

[–] fadingembers@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Holy fuck I need to get out of Texas

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

The time is now or as soon as you can.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

I gotta say I figured they'd use interstate extradition to bring back women who'd left for an abortion. I did not think they'd be dumb enough to try and act like their laws apply to hospital staff in other states.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago

We have a law in Washington which prevents healthcare providers from sharing the information that the Texas attorney general is requesting. I love my state.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 9 months ago

I'm reading between the lines a bit, but I think the idea is that Texas thinks SCH is providing care that violated Texas law via telemedicine. That's why they're asking about stuff like patients of SCH who had their labs done in Texas.

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Texas should just get it over with and invade America so we can put them back in their place where they belong

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Greg Abbott was famously one of the dingleberries fooled by Russian propaganda about operation Jade Helm and instructed the Texas national guard to "watch over" the operation as if they matter at all in the considerations of a joint millitary nation-wide operation. In other words, their delusions are already most of the way there.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Southern dingalings in general.

[–] calabast@lemm.ee 27 points 9 months ago

Man, it sure is nice that Texas doesn't have any other issues it needs to deal with, like it's power grid or anything. Suuuuure must be nice to be elected and get to spend all your time doing zany bullshit that helps no one.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 23 points 9 months ago

State's Rights! But also we need access to every state's PEDIATRIC HEALTHCARE RECORDS!

[–] TrumpetX@programming.dev 22 points 9 months ago

States rights!!

(Republicans: not like that!)

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 20 points 9 months ago

I continue to be annoyed that texas is wasting all of this time on this. Go solve real problems. Except republicans are seemingly incapable of that, so I guess this is what we get.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Why do they have to sue? Why do they have to respond at all? Texas isn't Washington and not only is there no jurisdiction, there's no standing for the courts either.

https://washingtonstatestandard.com/2023/06/24/how-washingtons-shield-law-protects-abortion-patients-coming-from-other-states/

[–] ericisshort@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Because Texas threatens criminal prosecution for anyone who does not comply. And these people are probably concerned that if they just say no and don’t sue, they will most likely face criminal litigation in Texas that could cause arrest warrants that could affect them if and when they travel.

[–] aniki@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right but outside of issuing an arrest warrant in the state of Texas, what else could they do? They are not federal and have no greater authority.

[–] doctordevice@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

So you think it's totally fine that people just doing their fully legal job in the state they live and work in should be subjected to arrest warrants that prevent them from ever safely entering a completely different state?

"Sorry boss, I can't go to that conference. It's hosted in Texas and I'll be arrested as I exit the plane."

[–] aniki@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

I never made a judgement on the outcome.