this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
61 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18870 readers
5005 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Too bad Missourians won't strike down the Republican party. I guarantee you they will continue to do stupid shit.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We tried passing a law to get rid of them, but they just changed the law so they didn't have to redistrict.

So then we passed an amendment, and they just ignored that.

[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Yes, but that's largely because Democrats don't run statewide. Republicans run for every seat across the state and often win un opposed. So despite the state pushing for and voting for reasonable things. There's always evil toadies to undo it. Because far too much of the state will never learn.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Striking down a law against homelessness: outstanding.

Striking down a law against vaccine mandate (edit) BANS: ~as someone who’s immunocompromised, fuck you with every fiber of my being, Missouri Supreme Court. Stop politicizing public fucking health.~ I had it backwards. I am sorry. Also good job on striking down the BAN on vaccine mandates.

My apologies - I had the vaccine ruling inverted. That topic triggers me a bit since I and my mother both have to deal with that shit personally.

[–] DreadPirateShawn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think you have the vaccine part backwards?

In this case, the sweeping 64-page bill also dealt with city and county governance and banned COVID-19 vaccine requirements for public workers in Missouri.

The court struck down the law that banned mandates.

You are 100% right; I have made edits to my previous comment to reflect that. That’s what I get for reacting to a headline instead of reading the damn article lol

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


(AP) — The Missouri Supreme Court on Tuesday struck down a law that threatened homeless people with jail time for sleeping on state land.

The judges’ ruling means unhoused people no longer face up to 15 days in jail and a $500 fine after an initial warning for sleeping on state land without permission, and vaccine mandates for public workers now are allowed in Missouri.

The law, enacted in 2022, also had prohibited state funding from being used for permanent housing for homeless people, instead directing it toward temporary shelters and assistance with substance use and mental health treatment.

Records obtained by The AP show attempts to clear homeless encampments increased in cities from Los Angeles to New York as public pressure grew to address what some residents say are dangerous and unsanitary living conditions.

In March, bulldozers took down what was left of a once-busy homeless encampment along the Mississippi River and near the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, ending nearly a year of debate over what to do about it.

Supreme Court judges ruled against the Missouri law without discussing the potential impact of the homelessness policy, instead focusing on whether that issue fits under the bill’s subject: political subdivisions.


The original article contains 495 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 59%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!