this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2021
24 points (96.2% liked)

Linux

47369 readers
1138 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hun7r@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Diversity is nice and it's unfortunate we live in a world where companies have to even make announcements like this. The controversy in these comments alone show the sad state of this whole "issue-that-shouldnt-be-one-but-it-is-because-humans-suck."

Unfortunately most of the time it's just platitudes and patting each other on the back without actually addressing any problems.

[–] Itookmyprozac@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Hey! Our name is "Linux Foundation". Let's focus on something else because why not!?

We have $177 million so spending "just 3.4% of our money on Linux" is enough, don't you think, guys? Guys?

[–] cameraandsickle@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 years ago

Such a dumb criticism of the foundation. Their stated goal is to "standardize Linux and support open source development". So yeah, they support open source projects aside from Linux, who would've thunk it? And the Linux kernel doesn't seem to suffer from a lack of funding.

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

They don't care about Linux for a long time now. They don't even use Linux.

[–] 0x90@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why focusing on meritocracy to produce a better result, when you can politicize technologies and focus on people feelings, sexuality, propaganda, that sure will help to select the best engineers.

[–] glorpster@feddit.de 9 points 2 years ago

Because to claim that real world systems come even close to being a meritocracy is an illusion. You can't fix systemic inequalities and discrimination without, well, addressing them.

[–] cameraandsickle@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 2 years ago

Baffling that the suggestion that maybe minorities being harassed/made to feel unsafe in the workplace might influence their performance and therefore the quality of open source software is so controversial.

Let me guess, you're a white dude. We have the luxury of being able to ignore "politics". For other people their existence is a political question and affects every aspect of their life. Maybe we should do something about that. But what do I know I'm just a snowflake who is offended by everything, right?