this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
20 points (95.5% liked)

Linux

48193 readers
1452 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Any explanation on how this happens?

Access: 2023-12-14 07:57:28.376736001 +1300 Modify: 2023-12-14 07:50:20.783207177 +1300 Change: 2023-12-14 07:51:57.413989824 +1300 Birth: 2023-12-14 07:51:57.413989824 +1300

Just as a matter of curiosity

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

FWIW, the stat structure in Linux does not include birth time [1]. It only gives you:

  1. atime: The time of last access.
  2. mtime: The time of last modification.
  3. ctime: The time of the last change to the inode.

I assume the stat command is using a filesystem-specific method to get the birth time.

Anyway, I don't think any of these stats is guaranteed to be consistent with the rest (or even correct). For example, it is common to disable atime tracking to improve I/O performance.

Assuming the data is accurate, I think the other comment about the file being a copy is the best explanation.

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The stat command is using statx, which gives you a slightly different struct. statx is the cool new Linux-only system call for stat-ing. Not every filesystem will support the new btime field. (And, as you correctly say, many of those time fields are wrong, anyway)

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Ooo neat. I was not aware of this syscall. TIL!

The struct returned by stat doesn't, but statx contains creation time as well as well. I believe ext4 is already tracking the creation time even if stat can't provide it.

The stat command on modern distros should get you this additional metadata, unless you use an FS that doesn't track or expose it, of course.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 6 points 11 months ago

I don't know what exact situation could have happened here but I imagine a copy could have also copied the metadata into a new file. So it creates a new file as the destination (setting the birth date), then as part of copying the file it copied the access and modify times.

There are ways this can happen even without the technicalities of date tracking on the Linux file system. Take, for example, Microsoft's decision to store local time in the system clock. If you dual boot, and don't configure either Linux or Windows to be consistent with the other, your clock will be off by one or more hours, unless you happen to live at UTC+00:00. Every modern computer users NTP to automatically correct itself, but it's not uncommon to see tons of files with weird timestamps after booting Windows.

Even without dual booting, it's possible your computer's clock has drifted into the future when it was off, and got corrected later. That would explain seconds or minutes of differences.