this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
-43 points (10.9% liked)

politics

18957 readers
3722 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (8 children)

Hunter Biden isn't relevant to anything. He's a nobody.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (16 children)

This Kremlin propaganda outlet only cares about Jared Kushner when they're criticizing Israel.

48 Search Results for: Hunter Biden

39 Search Results for: Jared Kushner

It would be amazing that they've covered private citizen Hunter Biden more than they covered Trump Admin official Jared Kushner if I were a credulous enough sucker to actually believe they were a good-faith progressive publication.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 14 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Hunter Biden, the president’s problematic son, has finally been indicted for his years of tax evasion. Only in an egregiously unequal society like ours do the children of the rich and powerful get away with corruption for as long as Hunter Biden has.

I guess my old coworker who made $35k a year and evaded their taxes for more than 30yrs was just lying.

Fuck off with this "OnLy ThE rIcH CaN eVaDe TaXeS." Lots of people do it without getting audited. There's plenty of reasons to be pissed off about the two tiers of justice, but this Hunter Biden angle is just ignorant and smacks of Republicans clutching their pearls as they try to build public momentum for their impeachment bullshit.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Holy shit, I bailed on Jacobin Mag when the Ukraine War started and they cried "Both sides!" on every other piece, but this is a new low.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world -5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Hope you hate it <3 I love sharing Jacobin cause they generate a lot of interaction and agitate people's status quo notions. Marxist view of Russia is like that, mistaken for "both sides" analysis (which breaks American's brains) cause they don't understand the materialist view of anything. Blame lack of education and their shitty news media for that. Anyway enjoy.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"It's a Marxist analysis of Russia!"

No, it's just apologism for imperialism while claiming anti-imperialism. Imagine being this brainrotted.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world -3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That makes no sense ^. Anti-imperialism requires criticizing America's global actions and you interpret that as pro-Russia. Simple as that.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That makes no sense ^. Anti-imperialism requires criticizing America’s global actions and you interpret that as pro-Russia. Simple as that.

If you regard "Anti-imperialism" as "criticizing America's global actions" and not "criticizing imperialist actions, including imperialist actions by America", then you're interpreting "Anti-imperialism" as "Anti-America". A common mistake amongst brainrotted morons who turn international politics into a religion where they can embrace a big scawwy 'Great Satan' to oppose and claim Marxism instead of doing actual materialist analysis, but not in any way valid.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Exactly you can't criticize imperialism as it's relevant to the Russia Ukraine war without including America in that economic reality. This is what people freak out about, because a materialist analysis would look at what resources are present in Ukraine, Russian oligarchs pressuring their government to allow them access to them, Ukraine wanting it for them and appealing to their interests, America assisting in that and helping them because it's in their economic interests as well. Then you have the public image of the war obfuscated from these conditions, and that's what people get upset about because they are invested in Ukraine as an arm of America's imperialism not as a truly independent state controlled by Ukrainians. If Ukrainians wanted to be in Russia they would drop them, and probably will because that's what America often does to it's allies in these conflicts. For now there's still rational reasons to continue it from bOtH SidEs, but the Kurds know what it's like to be on the receiving end of US military aid. Israel is willing to do the US' dirty work required in the arrangement so they keep getting US aid.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is what people freak out about, because a materialist analysis would look at what resources are present in Ukraine, Russian oligarchs pressuring their government to allow them access to them, Ukraine wanting it for them and appealing to their interests, America assisting in that and helping them because it’s in their economic interests as well.

... you... you do realize that materialist analysis extends far beyond conflicts over resources, right?

... right...?

Oh, who am I kidding, of course you don't.

If Ukrainians wanted to be in Russia they would drop them

If Ukraine wanted to be in Russia there wouldn't be a fucking war, so of course?

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

Oh sorry didn't realize you wanted the entire materialist analysis of the world to consider it valid lol, it's not like you disagreed with my summary though...

Exactly there would be no war, the fact there is one means we can analyze it like any other regional war between imperialist and independent/imperialist-backed nations. It's that which people take to be pro-Russia because it's not injected with pandering. American's need pandering or they think it's anti-American or pro-enemy.

[–] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Someone make a meme about lemmy users believing they’re on the left.

[–] Potatofish@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've never seen an OP get so thoroughly trounced in the comments. I guess this wasn't the right sub for spreading fud, 🤔..

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Eh I posted this for a laugh to get this exact response. American's will cry about how issues like these aren't relevant as Trump wins over catering to them and have nothing to say in response. They'll blame people like me who say they need to not bury their head in the sand rather than themselves and their party for it's failures. When fascism came to Germany all the citizens shared collective blame for it to some degree, so it will be for Americans.

[–] Potatofish@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yet you tried so hard. Did you laugh so hard? Quick! Add the lol emoji to each of your responses!

No one is buying your sad attempts.

[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You sound like an internet debate-bro

[–] Potatofish@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago

Sure, whatever that means

load more comments
view more: next ›