politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
That makes no sense ^. Anti-imperialism requires criticizing America's global actions and you interpret that as pro-Russia. Simple as that.
If you regard "Anti-imperialism" as "criticizing America's global actions" and not "criticizing imperialist actions, including imperialist actions by America", then you're interpreting "Anti-imperialism" as "Anti-America". A common mistake amongst brainrotted morons who turn international politics into a religion where they can embrace a big scawwy 'Great Satan' to oppose and claim Marxism instead of doing actual materialist analysis, but not in any way valid.
Exactly you can't criticize imperialism as it's relevant to the Russia Ukraine war without including America in that economic reality. This is what people freak out about, because a materialist analysis would look at what resources are present in Ukraine, Russian oligarchs pressuring their government to allow them access to them, Ukraine wanting it for them and appealing to their interests, America assisting in that and helping them because it's in their economic interests as well. Then you have the public image of the war obfuscated from these conditions, and that's what people get upset about because they are invested in Ukraine as an arm of America's imperialism not as a truly independent state controlled by Ukrainians. If Ukrainians wanted to be in Russia they would drop them, and probably will because that's what America often does to it's allies in these conflicts. For now there's still rational reasons to continue it from bOtH SidEs, but the Kurds know what it's like to be on the receiving end of US military aid. Israel is willing to do the US' dirty work required in the arrangement so they keep getting US aid.
... you... you do realize that materialist analysis extends far beyond conflicts over resources, right?
... right...?
Oh, who am I kidding, of course you don't.
If Ukraine wanted to be in Russia there wouldn't be a fucking war, so of course?
Oh sorry didn't realize you wanted the entire materialist analysis of the world to consider it valid lol, it's not like you disagreed with my summary though...
Exactly there would be no war, the fact there is one means we can analyze it like any other regional war between imperialist and independent/imperialist-backed nations. It's that which people take to be pro-Russia because it's not injected with pandering. American's need pandering or they think it's anti-American or pro-enemy.