this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
246 points (99.2% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 39 points 9 months ago (3 children)

A reminder that Trump is likely a Russian asset, he wanted a secret back channel with them, he was fucking around in Ukraine by blackmailing them to investigate Biden and make him look guilty, he practically kissed Putin's ring in Helsinki when he agreed to let them investigate their own crimes and send them a US ambassador.

[–] youngGoku@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Just to elaborate on Helsinki, he literally trusted Putin's word over his own intelligence agency (about 2016 election interference from Russia)

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I don't think it was an issue of "trust". I think we (those of us living in this reality) all know this, but it is moreso that he was bending to his master's will rather than let a US agency sway his actions. Especially if it is counter to his master's wishes. I am sure he knew that information was correct, but he needed to bury it.

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 9 months ago

To be fair, Trump trust is based on favors, and the intelligence agencies weren't doing him any.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Practically sucked putin’s dick live on stage. Shit was disgusting.

[–] athos77@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

Btw, it's been over 13 hours since this news broke, and I've literally just come over from Faux's home page. I scrolled through the entire thing, over 160 story-entries* and not a single word about this.

* I'm going with "story-entries" instead of just "stories" because some stories appear multiple times. Like they have three separate entries for the exact same story on Matthew Perry's death: is apparently the top news story of the day over at Faux, plus it's in the Entertainment section, and some other section I don't remember. But I'm not going through their front page looking for duplicates to not-count, so I'm just calling them "story-entries".

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Trump gave it to the Russians.

mystery solved.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

only after he made copies and sold those to the Chinese and Saudis.. he's a businessman..

[–] KnightontheSun@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

His boss would not appreciate that, so I doubt that happened.

Also remember that he's a bad businessman. Unless you consider grift to be his business. ... Damn, okay maybe he's good.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

it's an inherently confusing business, being a spy

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

not so sure he sold them to the chinese... they probably were lie, "we already know all of that. fuck off, orange man!"

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I agree that he probably didn't sell them, but I think it's more likely he just gave them away for free to look cool in front of the other leaders

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (3 children)

“But biden’s son showed his ding dong on the interwebs! Both sides are bad!”

/s is probably needed

Comforting to know everything I was telling people while he was in office about America being sold to foreign governments was spot on though. And he’s the republican front runner…

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

4 separate criminal indictments, 91 charges, and he’s the republican front runner.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 9 months ago

That only works if you're not a Reich wing media obsessed asshat. To them it's: 4 separate Democrat witch hunts and 91 bogus Democrat charges

It's a badge of honor to have voted for that scumbag to them.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

He's the r front runner because a lot of the r's are in the same boat with Putin, they can't go against trump or all will be revealed.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Cassidy Hutchinson, one of Meadows’ top aides, testified to Congress and wrote in her memoir that she believes Meadows took home an unredacted version of the binder. She said it had been kept in Meadows’ safe and that she saw him leave with it from the White House.

“I am almost positive it went home with Mr. Meadows,” Hutchinson told the January 6 committee in closed-door testimony, according to transcripts released last year.

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It didn't disappear. Trump knows exactly who he gave it to.

Remember the Russian intelligence operatives that Trump invited into the Oval Office after he was inaugurated? Pepperridge Farms remembers.

So does Jack Smith.

[–] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 16 points 9 months ago

Not good but sounds spot on for them, they are traitors after all and have more loyalty to Putin than the US.

[–] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

disappeared under Trump

Doesn't sound like much of a mystery to me. He probably hand delivered it to Putin himself.

[–] Jode@midwest.social 12 points 9 months ago

Check the coffin...

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Just a little light treason.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Note how Meadows keeps repeating that "he did not mishandle classified information". And they did mention in the article that Trump declassified it, intending to "release" it. But it's far more plausible that he declassified it with the express intent to bury it. It's clear that whatever was in that report, Trump and Meadows wanted to make sure nobody in the US ever read it.

Maybe Putin has a copy, but quite frankly I doubt it. If the report is as bad as I think, Trump would prefer that nobody has a copy

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

Why is this article like a game of clue?

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

If that orange dumbass could collect top secret papers at his Mar-o-Lago property, what's even secure at the White house? President, if that position is to stay, should be the most watched person by secret services, as his close circle should be too. With all these deep state conspiraces, why couldn't the deep state fucking notice key documents being stolen and destroyed by this car salesperson and his allies? It's embarassing and needs a fix.